The CODOH Revisionist Forum

What I'm asking you to do is provide a plausible explanation for how graves like #5 came to exist. Be detailed So specifically, using #5 as reference "Located in the south-western part of the camp. The grave had the shape of an irregular lengthened rectangle with the dimensions of 32 meters by 10 ...

Jews were starving to death en masse in the ghettos. 5,000 a month were dying in the Warsaw Ghetto. Maybe per kg emaciated people are harder to burn per kg, but there's also less to burn, lower water mass. Corpses liquifying also mean less space is wasted. There's kinetics here that are too ...

Jews were starving to death en masse in the ghettos. 5,000 a month were dying in the Warsaw Ghetto. Maybe per kg emaciated people are harder to burn per kg, but there's also less to burn, lower water mass. Corpses liquifying also mean less space is wasted. There's kinetics here that are too ...

Archie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:52 am

33 kg? Those are called children. Provan fit his own children in a box. Wow, what a game changer.

The key to determining volume is mass not age. Provan and the adults were probably significantly larger than the emaciated Polish Jews sent to Belzec.

That is so weak. You are trying to say that they had burned a bunch of the bodies beforehand? That is not and has never been the story. You, random guy on the internet, do not get to make up a new story out of nowhere. You're relying on secondary sources again. That's pretty weak and if I did that ...

https://i.ibb.co/whgq5gd/image.png 1,000kg / 40 kg = 25 bodies per m3 At 60% packing efficiency = 15 bombsaway, this is why you don't ask ChatGPT (trained on general knowledge) such specialized questions (which most of us here are better trained on). 15 bodies per m3 is completely insane. A 1 meter ...

While I wait on revisionists to come up with better explanations for the ash layers than Nazgul's, I can cover some of the other issues Assuming I have grave of 100 cubic meters, what is the highest amount of 40 kg bodies that grave could feasibly fit, accounting for inevitable space between bodies ...

But revisionists have no explanation for a) the large grave volume (21,000 cubic meters) b) the layers of ash deposited through out (in 95% of the graves), mixed with sand. Give me a hypothetical situation I will present a factual presentation, no hypothesis here. You assume ground disturbances are ...

The thing is, in regards to #1, there are various explanations here like bodies being burnt, Kola not investigating all the graves (he says this explicitly in his study - there may have been more), and the physics of decomposing bodies. But revisionists have no explanation for a) the large grave ...

The revisionist explanation for your 'missing Jews' is a simple one: "we (revisionists) lack the resources to ascertain where these Jews went, whereas the victors of WW2 held the motive and means to make these Jews 'disappear'". The thing is things cannot be assumed by "motive and means". I've ...

There is no evidence of even ten massive shipments of firewood or gasoline to any of the AR camps. Yet, you require some tens of thousands for your exterminationist beliefs to be true. And documentation aside, there would at least be witness statements about such significant happenings in these ...

Nazgul wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2024 3:09 am To be fair this is well within walking distance of the camp and no trains needed. In fact there is no railway to this transit camp.

Then why is it listed in the train document as a stop?

To be fair, there’s that one document referring to one of the Reinhard camp as a “Durchfuhrungslager.” That should overrule all the eyewitness evidence, bodies in the ground, and millions of missing Jews, nu? That's Himmler right? There's also the Korherr report, which speaks of the transport of 1.5 ...

I like how Mr. "Direct Evidence!" just makes blatant unprincipled exceptions whenever it suits him. Are there any testimonies saying that entire trains full of wood were making deliveries to Belzec and Treblinka every day? Any testimonies talking about how they spent all day unloading all that wood ...

If you had a witness saying, all the wood for the pyres was carried in by lumberjacks freshly cut and no liquid fuel was used, maybe you would have a point in all of this. Otherwise the score is (0% of your narrative is directly evidenced, and in contrast, most of the mainstream narrative is ...