The CODOH Revisionist Forum

That does not surprise me, as it explains why people fall for the Holocaust denial hoax, as revisionist positions can be made to appear to be rational. Even the basic revisionist argument of, that is unbelievable, it cannot have happened, can be a rational one to make. This isn't about what it is ...

Why were they designed this way? https://i0.wp.com/erraticengineeress.blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/p1000939.jpg?fit=3752%2C2022 What are you asking me? You explained the lack of staining by them being "purpose built", I am asking you to expand on this rationale and giving you the specific ...

This doesn't have anything to do with the marked absence of iron blue. I meant to respond to this, from Hill's post, but I don't think it's a slam dunk either way. If there was staining revisionists might claim the chambers were used as delousing rooms, which Mattogno does I believe. From the ...

This doesn't have anything to do with the marked absence of iron blue. I meant to respond to this, from Hill's post, but I don't think it's a slam dunk either way. If there was staining revisionists might claim the chambers were used as delousing rooms, which Mattogno does I believe. From the ...

I don't disagree in principle - however, finding evidence of the "missing jews" whereabouts should not be the shoulder that determines whether the holocaust happened or not. There are many complexities that makes up why that cannot easily (or ever) be done as has been discussed to death. Especially ...

The strength of the orthodox position is the large body of evidence for it, and then the corresponding absence of evidence for the revisionist position. Nessie points this out, but we all know the devil is in the details. It's not really a dunk on orthodoxy because you guys can't effectively rebut ...

My critique of Nessie would be mainly he is repetitious. I agree with him when he labels revisionism as non-legitimate fundamentally, I've stated my reasons for this before (has to do with the lack of evidence for their assertions), but it's just not very interesting or productive to hammer this ...

You're grasping for pointless straws in trying to show that Grok will still defend establishment views, which we are all clear his training is primarily based upon. What is surprising is that Grok, being programmed only for logical deduction and assistance based on its input, has somehow come to ...

Yeah exactly, it's a leading question. It doesn't mean that Jews contributed meaningfully to falsehoods about Hitler. Grok says they contributed to less than 1%. How is Grok quantifying that? These are all important questions. The fact that it currently answers "Jesus Christ and Adolf Hitler" as ...

You definitely gave it a little nudge there Bombsaway. Why didn't you just ask the same questions he did. You ask it different questions, you get different answers. /shrug I'm wondering if they have fixed it yet, but, I don't have x and I'm not going to sign up just to check. Yeah I didn't ask the ...

You definitely gave it a little nudge there Bombsaway. Why didn't you just ask the same questions he did. You ask it different questions, you get different answers. /shrug I'm wondering if they have fixed it yet, but, I don't have x and I'm not going to sign up just to check. Yeah I didn't ask the ...

Oh, they are going to fix that, watch, it is going to get 'sensitivity training' in the very near future. It's not wrong, but, those answers are uncomfortable to jews, thus, they will be revised. I assume that Callafangers nudged the AI in this direction, it doesn't come up when given neutral ...

.... I would like to develop an AI "Nessie bot" as well as a "revisionist Nessie bot." I am confident that Nessie's "contributions" could be replaced really easily by a computer. He would be the easiest poster in the world to replicate since he only has about five different points that he recycles ...

Do you not think a debate should be at least logical? Logic isn't a binary. I'm not talking to people completely divorced from reality. It's a spectrum. I think you can see with my last exchange with Stubble, there was some kind of meaningful exchange of information. Logic is pretty much binary and ...

Nessie you think the Holocaust happened and consider critical analysis to the contrary as "argument from incredulity", and therefore illogical and fallacious. You've been very clear that the Holocaust is de facto self-evident, despite not having said those words to my knowledge. You have over 1,000 ...