The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Nessie makes repeated but vague claims like the following... Archie, I have provided you with the information you requested about; - which witnesses I rely on - why I think they are reliable - the archaeological data - revisionist reliance on credibility - 100% of witnesses supporting gassings - no ...

Nessie makes repeated but vague claims like the following... Archie, I have provided you with the information you requested about; - which witnesses I rely on - why I think they are reliable - the archaeological data - revisionist reliance on credibility - 100% of witnesses supporting gassings - no ...

How the hell can he claim that people were gassed in the kremas? The mind reading of a sprawling bureaucracy according to Raul Hilberg? :lol: Pierre and his team ensured that the Jews got off the transports and then to the various quarter. The narrative states the Jews went directly to the gas ...

Berg is not a witness to what happened inside the Kremas, which he clearly states were used for gassings How the hell can he claim that people were gassed in the kremas? The mind reading of a sprawling bureaucracy according to Raul Hilberg? :lol: Berg's claim about gassings is hearsay. He is ...

When a defence disputes the criminal act even took place, the onus is on them to provide evidence of what did happen. Nonsense, it is up to the prosecution to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt . There are many instances of the defendant saying absolutely nothing. "Because a defendant is presumed ...

..... The Soviet reports were of poor quality, with limited information, which is why revisionist suggestions that they ran the hoax make no sense. Nazgul claiming over 11 million Soviets were active in the Holocaust hoax, does not square with complaints they were producing vague reports. Admitting ...

... No one is suggesting that every statement is 100% made up. Even the most fanciful of the survivor memoirs usually have a lot of correct factual information. The major disputed points like the gas chambers are what we care about. The idea is that the statements are systematically distorted on ...

... Once later trials were under way, defendants and their lawyers could and did try full negationist routines without consequences... Could you please provide an example of what you mean by "full negationist"? .... denial that something happened, ever = full negationist (there were no homicidal ...

Can you exemplify this? At the Nuremberg trials where they were used as evidence, "even this court was surprised at how conspicuously vague the existing 'USSR Event Reports' were with respect to location, point in time, units, and other details such as troop strength, armaments, auxiliary forces ...

Claiming that if you can't find a document it's because it was destroyed is the same as claiming dark energy in cosmology, an ad hoc explanation to explain gaps in the theory. Revisionists claim lots of documents were destroyed, look at what Nazgul is claiming in this thread! "...the Russian ...

SanityCheck wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2024 2:08 am ... Once later trials were under way, defendants and their lawyers could and did try full negationist routines without consequences...

Could you please provide an example of what you mean by "full negationist"?

I think it's the exterminationists who constantly claim destruction of documents and yet claim that the Holocaust is the most documented event in history. It is one of the documented events in history, with obvious, specific instances of destruction of documents. No document from an AR camp or ...

Nazgul is exampling, again, how he is working well outwith his experience and knowledge. Evidence gathering is basic to all investigations. Nazgul thinks that because he cannot find, and I cannot produce Fplo other than for transports to the AR camps, that is evidence of mass destruction of Fplo ...

You are claiming transport records have been disappeared, but you have produced no evidence of that happening. They do not exist except for a few that mention "Treblinka", that is evidence. In a criminal investigation this would be put to the jury as "Spoliation of evidence". That is an example of ...

He did not work inside the Kremas. He is NOT a witness. You are trolling me now, going round in circles. This is the last post from me on this issue, in reply to your repetitions. He was a kapo at the ramps at Birkenau who saw where the inmates went. None of them went to the Kremas. If there was ...