The CODOH Revisionist Forum

If you only read the narrative histories of the Holocaust, which emphasise the eyewitness evidence, as it is the best narrative evidence, then you get the wrong impression that the Holocaust "largely consists" of testimonies. If you read the archive and archaeological evidence, which I regularly ...

I have, to my best recollection, never read an explanation of how the Germans dug the large pits with their excavator; how was the spoil removed; and from where did the earth to refill the excavated pits come from? It does seem to raise a lot of practical/operational problems that seem to have been ...

Again, this argument that Poles and Soviets in the postwar period were independent entities. The Soviets and Poles collaborated on all this with commissions and show trials, each in their own way of presenting the story to the public, with the Soviets portraying atrocities in general and the Poles ...

My position doesn't require "Stalin to believe it was a Hoax", merely I require "Stalin to believe it was untenable for credibility purposes". This is consistent with other authority figures and decision makers as has now been demonstrated to you ad nauseam, and in particular is consistent with how ...

And since when am I obliged to accept anything? If I hand wave away all the evidence that the British bombed Dresden in 1945, does that mean therefore the British did not bomb Dresden in 1945? The answer is clearly, no. But you think if you hand wave away all the evidence for the Holocaust, such as ...

.... This is a lie; Revisionists point out that the evidentiary basis for the Holocaust (to the extent there has even been any attempt to justify it in terms of evidence) largely consists testimonies collected after the war, a surprisingly weak and unreliable foundation for such extraordinary ...

What corroborated the witnesses' claims? If I say you're a thief, I'd have to prove the materiality of the theft under threat of slander or defamation. What did the Jewish witnesses offer? Videos, high-quality photos, audio recordings of the perpetrators on site? No, they said a bunch of ...

No one denies that bodies may have been cremated; it's just that the alleged quantity is unprovable due to a variety of obstacles. Therefore, confessing to cremating people doesn't prove they killed them or that they cremated them to hide something. The Nazi confessions are corroborated by the ...

...I don't have any more time to defend myself against baseless personal attacks. I'm clearly not stupid so to even entertain that kind of insult is not worth the time. Whether or not you believe I am lying is also uninteresting to me, but I don't think I have even intentionally misled anybody on ...

As an addendum: Lest this be categorised as "cherry picking", this was absolutely in character and understood about Stalin. See below as per Daniel Harrington "Berlin On The Brink" https://i.imgur.com/MJFngWf.png Yet again this confirms to us what you have now been told repeatedly: Stalin simply ...

You are now arguing Stalin did not comment on the gas chambers, because he knew they were not credible, so does that mean you think that the gas chambers were not a Soviet hoax? No. And you are still not getting it, hilariously. So i'll invoke another example, even thought Wetzelrad's example was ...

... His arguments are weak and he is easily pummeled, and this being an internet venue, everyone with an active internet connection can ostensibly see it. Interesting that you say "argument" not "evidence". You still do not get that history is evidenced, not argued. Saying "your evidence is weak ...

Nobody is this stupid. Seems I was wrong. Stalin not commenting on the gas chambers means he knew they were discrediting to comment on. If they were credible, he would have credibly commented on them. See Wetzelrad's reply from earlier re Bush WMDs. The document I showed you demonstrates how High ...

Franz Stangl claimed that a piece of wood the size of a cigarette pack was enough, and that the women's fat was more than enough. You do this a lot. Why not quote Stangl, rather than your dishonest misrepresentation? Witnesses conflict; some say they harvested wood from the camp perimeter, others ...

. Seven principles Propagandists rely upon 1. LYING BIG Big lies work better than small lies because people find it hard to believe that anyone would invent ‘such a colossal lie’. 2. FOCUSING ON CERTAIN ISSUES By not making it too complicated and concentrating on certain points it is possible to ign ...