The CODOH Revisionist Forum

... You said There are evidenced secrecy measures for the death camps, which means prisoners and even some staff not knowing what was happening is to be expected. Vrba and Wetzler gathered information, mostly hearsay and related that in their reports. That’s nonsense. Mass murder of this magnitude c ...

.... You said The Final Solution and motive to exterminate the Jews is well evidenced, from the Wannsee Minutes to the Einsatzgruppen OSRs. Come on, you've read the Wannsee conference, there's no reference to a mass extermination, it was clearly about deportation and relocation. The Einsatzgruppen ...

You said Name an SS guard who worked at an AR camp or Chelmno who states there were no gassings. Do the same for A-B, but remember it was a huge complex of camps, so only SS directly involved with the selection process and the Kremas are eyewitnesses. Franz Suchomel was a Unterscharführer at ...

I mean, I’d say that he’s not wrong, although the argument begs the question. Of course I am not wrong. If two scientists have opposing hypothesis, the hypothesis that is evidenced wins over the hypothesis that is not evidenced. That is not begging the question, which would assume a hypothesis is co ...

... This concept is very amusing to me. I imagine it would go something like this: Revisionist Nessie Bot: "Gassings did not happen because there is no Prussian Blue in the walls." That is not an unreasonable argument. There is reason to expect a gas chambers to show Prussian Blue in the walls ...

.... I would like to develop an AI "Nessie bot" as well as a "revisionist Nessie bot." I am confident that Nessie's "contributions" could be replaced really easily by a computer. He would be the easiest poster in the world to replicate since he only has about five different points that he recycles ...

.... I would like to develop an AI "Nessie bot" as well as a "revisionist Nessie bot." I am confident that Nessie's "contributions" could be replaced really easily by a computer. He would be the easiest poster in the world to replicate since he only has about five different points that he recycles ...

.... Logic is pretty much binary and you are engaging with an illogical argument, using an illogical argument. As for your next post and repetition, I find it odd that I get criticised for repetition, when my repetition is due to the repetitive use of the same debunked, illogical arguments. It is ...

Because this is a debate forum Do you not think a debate should be at least logical? Logic isn't a binary. I'm not talking to people completely divorced from reality. It's a spectrum. I think you can see with my last exchange with Stubble, there was some kind of meaningful exchange of information ...

Nessie you think the Holocaust happened.. Yes, because of all the evidence it happened. .... and consider critical analysis to the contrary as "argument from incredulity", and therefore illogical and fallacious. I do, when that is the case. Not all analysis is flawed revisionist analysis. You've ...

... As for the co output %, my best estimate based on empirical data would be that it would be over 10% . I went w 6 because I am again being generous. ... I get why revisionists argue from incredulity, as they have no evidence and do not understand logic. I don't get why you give their argument ...

I thought it was clear, what I was saying. I know that Green rebuts Rudolf, because of the evidence that homicidal gassings happened. I cannot make it any clearer or succinct than that. If you still do not understand, then I cannot help you, due to your inability to get to grips with evidencing ...

There is evidence to prove mass gassings. There is no evidence to prove delousing, showering, corpse storage or bomb shelter. So morgues were not used for corpses; by definition Leichenkellers are morgues and morgues hold corpses. It seems the fear of gas in WW1 and the fake atrocity propagand then ...

I am not a chemist, so I cannot reliably say who is correct, based on their analysis and testing. I can reliably say that Green is correct and Rudolf is wrong, based on the evidence of usage of the Leichenkellers. There is evidence to prove mass gassings. There is no evidence to prove delousing ...

It is the other way around, Green rebuts Rudolf. Go through the Dr Green / Rudolf exchanges again. Post here what points you believe Dr Green makes that "rebut" Rudolf. Use as many as you like, but stick to Dr Green's own words, not your interpretation of them. Edit: Actually this would be wildly ...