joshk246 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 06, 2025 3:54 pm
....
Yes, I know what is claimed.
All the preposterous outdoor cremation nonsense.
Just because so-called revisionists cannot believe pyres were possible, because of their calculations about the wood needed, does not evidence there were no mass graves.
Wiernik stated Katyn was the reason why the Nazis started to exhume and cremate corpses. The government of Nazi Germany announced the discovery of mass graves in the Katyn Forest in April 1943. Wiernik was in Treblinka during this announcement and escaped during the uprising of 2 August 1943. He ...
It was the Nazi intention to leave no complete corpses, to prevent a body count, as was managed at Katyn. The grave robbing and use of explosives, made finding whole corpses even less likely. The Staff in the area would know nothing about Katyn. Bombs do explode but are not really explosives as you ...
The buildings were set on fire remember. Indeed, the camp was demolished, planted over, and left guarded. All by the Nazis. What were they doing there? Why did they use excavators? Why did Soviet bombs uncover so many human remains? Why did Soviet bombs uncover so many human remains? “so many”, not ...
Look at the uniform shading of the ploughed fields around the camp and how inside the camp is a mix of so many shades of ground with some areas showing rectangular outlines. There are planted and vegetation free areas, mixed together. That photo, along with all the other evidence I listed, proves ...
You love to post images of maps with dots on them. You then fail to show what the Jewish population of each camp, represented by a dot, was in 1942, or indeed any other year. If you bothered to read testimonies of Jews sent to these camps, they were in constant flux. Some Jews went to 17 camps ...
But, you do not bother to look for evidence of millions of Jews resettled around Lublin, since even you know that did not happen. Location of Lublin surrounded by Jewish Labour camps 1942 https://i.ibb.co/tMHbRqZd/Untitled.jpg You love to post images of maps with dots on them. You then fail to show ...
Look at the uniform shading of the ploughed fields around the camp and how inside the camp is a mix of so many shades of ground with some areas showing rectangular outlines. There are planted and vegetation free areas, mixed together. That photo, along with all the other evidence I listed, proves ...
why they dig up so much of the ground. Aerial bombing. The evidence from eyewitnesses to excavators at TII in 1942, the eyewitnesses to mass graves in the camp, the Kurt Franz 1943 photos of excavators and the 1944 aerial photo, showing disturbed ground prior to the arrival of the Soviets, all ...
.... Nice try, Nessie of the Gaps. Everything CSC found was consistent with the Revisionist position, and to extrapolate any further from her findings is just that, baseless extrapolation - ie God Of The Gaps https://i.imgur.com/8DuK5sF.png I would not call where the memorial and trees are, gaps ...
This aerial photo, of the camp as it was in 2011, with the areas that the survey found to have disturbed ground, compared to the size of the camp and how much is taken up by trees and the memorial, will be ignored by so-called revisionists; https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/ace/standard/320/mcs/media/images ...
Do you? Lukaszkiewicz‘s “evidence”, for what it’s even worth, doesn’t show anywhere near what is claimed. Eyewitnesses describe graves which cannot physically accommodate 700,000 bodies Point me to where graves that can accommodate 700,000 people are. I think the area of 2 hectares, up to 7m deep, i ...
...Do you understand what constitutes evidence? Do you? Lukaszkiewicz‘s “evidence”, for what it’s even worth, doesn’t show anywhere near what is claimed. Eyewitnesses describe graves which cannot physically accommodate 700,000 bodies Point me to where graves that can accommodate 700,000 people are. ...