The CODOH Revisionist Forum

3) Jews themselves were unaware to the extermination plan throughout the war and continued to fall for the fake shower trick for over three years. This would imply that although the Zionist orgs "knew" in 1942, they were unable to inform their own people. This includes the Hungarian Jews in 1944 ...

borjastick wrote: ↑Fri Jun 27, 2025 5:37 pmThey didn't.

I came across this article responding to Trent Horn: https://lesteryelten.substack.com/p/refuting-trent-horn-on-the-holocaust Who is this badass that wrote the article? Gone are the days when one could not casually stumble across outstanding, well-informed revisionist articles in random blog posts.

Lets verify if what the eyewitnesses say is true Oh look, its all true how do you know because the eyewitnesses said so Wash, rinse, repeat Revisionists: "Did a lot of them lie, though?" Exterminationists: "Uhh what do you mean by 'a lot'? That's subjective... A lot of things can be 'a lot ...

As said before, that would be my one and only direct response to your AI. The "statistical noise" is relative -- we are looking for instances of motivated or deceptive reporting of a specific, predetermined figure (6 million). This means that actual, legitimate reporting of the movements, activities ...

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=six+million+Jews%2Cfive+million+Jews&year_start=1910&year_end=1945&corpus=en&smoothing=50&case_insensitive=false "five" million is still more frequently used over the period in question, that's the average. Your ngram proves nothing. The spike during ...

And for most of ww2, up until 1945 , 5 million was mentioned more Dude it's quite obvious, 5 million was at least as commonly used over this period, you're cherry picking https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=5+million+jews%2C6+million+jews&year_start=1910&year_end=1945&corpus=en&smoothing ...

pre-war and during the war yeah. your graphs make that point for me. Thanks for the research, good job. Pre-war, the levels were still much higher for "six million" (about 50% higher): PreWW2.jpg Importantly, the First World War seems to have spiked the "six million" claims but not so much for ...

And see here, from Wikipedia of the early 2000s: The commonly used figure for the number of Jewish victims is six million, so much so that the phrase "six million" is now almost universally interpreted as referring to the Jewish victims of the Holocaust, though mainstream estimates by historians of ...

bombsaway wasn't aware that the "6 million" figure has more prominence than "5 million" or other adjacent 'millions'... sure. :roll: Here ya' go, bombsaway: 6M-f.jpg The above charts are from Google's NGram Viewer. The values (percentages) shown in the charts represent the relative frequency of a ...

Bombsaway's continued denial of the six million is interesting to observe. I have to wonder what planet he has been living on with this "5M was actually more popular than 6M theory." I was initially somewhat angry over what seems to be brazen dishonesty but now I can only only chuckle at such ...

I think the point is, that people with ethnic solidarity play up the dangers their brethren are in. Of course, if your pattern recognition is out of whack, you see this as evidence of hoaxing. Imagine if a million south africans were actually genocided, deniers of that could use this same argument ...

The sources are helpful but it's really the coherent argumentation that I value. There is maybe some of that here but these personal attacks are untrue and miserable to deal with. Here goes ConfusedJew again, pretending to be reasonable, innocent, and just "curious". People calling you a "liar" and ...

The issue is conflicts of interest . Going back many centuries, diaspora Jews have been a small but consequential minority population in European societies. If they just made their money and kept to themselves there wouldn't be too much of an issue. But their tendency is to become dominate in media ...

You have been exposed again for your obviously-underhanded tactics. You earn zero points for having debated the 'strawman' of an AI summary I provided. Debate my own words , or stop pretending you can. You are not even close to being smart enough or decent enough as a person to be worth my time ...