The CODOH Revisionist Forum

"Then the unearthing and cremation of the corpses began. It lasted from November 1942 until March 1943. The cremation was conducted day and night without interruption. At first the burning took place at one site, and later on at two." Nessie, you seriously cannot see the contradiction in that ...

What does joshk246 present to back up his incredulity? The answer is his asserted opinion and more argument, rather than evidence. Nessie, why are you maliciously focusing on my conclusion instead of debating me on the actual argument above it? My actual argument was the non existent weather tight ...

https://youtu.be/lCMPNreyIvQ So last night I was watching Felton’s video about some of Hitlers ashes that might still remain in Germany. Mark was explaining how Hitler and Eva’s bodies were burned according to the record, at the time stamp 9:15 he says “The staff faced two major problems in attem ...

TlsMS93 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 7:28 pm Franz Stangl said that a piece of wood the size of a cigarette box and the fat from the bodies were enough for each body. This explains the German method

Is Franz quoted in “scholarly” holocaust books?

Just because you find the claims about mass pyres hard to accept, does not therefore mean they did not happen. Your opinion does not determine what happened, evidence does. lol, “evidence does” what evidence! That’s the whole point we don’t believe these ridiculous theories and how many times you ha ...

The revisionist arguments from incredulity are logically flawed. Just because you cannot work out how the pyres burnt so many corpses etc, does not therefore prove it did not happen. The ground at Belzec was not subject to permafrost and it could be dug up. There is evidence of corpses being ...

Archie wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 2:29 pm
This is going to be a general Holocaust debate on a podcast for general audience. It's not going to be a PhD-level deep-dive into the chemistry.

Nessie knows this, just nitpicking as usual.

What is the anti-revionist consensus for the lack of millions of kilograms of wood at AR camps and the lack of a wood storage facility? The way the open air cremation pyres are described to of worked would have meant the 'fuel'-i.e kindling wood, would of had to been bone dry and possibly built ...

Germar Rudolf is a chemist. Why would a debate be set up between a chemist and a historian? Why not find a chemist he can debate with? Rudolf does not produce a contemporaneously evidenced chronological history of what happened inside the Kremas 1943-4, to discuss with a historian. Instead, he ...

Germar Rudolf is a chemist. Why would a debate be set up between a chemist and a historian? Why not find a chemist he can debate with? Rudolf does not produce a contemporaneously evidenced chronological history of what happened inside the Kremas 1943-4, to discuss with a historian. Instead, he ...

Nick Terry is willing to debate on here. He seems to be the best candidate for it. If he won't agree to it, I can't imagine any other historians would. If we're expanding it to non-historians, then I'm sure there are plenty out there willing to debate, it's just a matter of finding them. I did ...

So, supposedly 4 historians have pulled out of the Germar Rudolf debate on the Jake Shields podcast. We know how much time the exterminationist's spend on this forum so why have none of you decided to put your money where your mouth is?... On camera.