Page 7 of 8

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:04 pm
by Nessie
Back on topic, where is there evidence of 1.27 million Jews transported through the AR camps in the General Government, to the east?

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:18 pm
by Keen
Nessie wrote: Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:04 pm Back on topic, where is there evidence of 1.27 million Jews transported through the AR camps in the General Government, to the east?
I can do more than show you the evidence, I can show you the proof:
NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE - PROVES - NO MASS MURDER

https://thisisaboutscience.com/

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:02 am
by Nazgul
Nessie wrote: Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:04 pm Back on topic, where is there evidence of 1.27 million Jews transported through the AR camps in the General Government, to the east?
Korherr report is the evidence.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:16 am
by Nessie
Nazgul wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:02 am
Nessie wrote: Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:04 pm Back on topic, where is there evidence of 1.27 million Jews transported through the AR camps in the General Government, to the east?
Korherr report is the evidence.
Korherr said that when he asked, he was told resettlement in the east was in the Lublin district. There is no evidence of over a million Jews being accommodated there, by the end of 1942.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:26 am
by Nazgul
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:16 am There is no evidence of over a million Jews being accommodated there, by the end of 1942.
Crap, the Reich had over 40 thousand camps with Jews in many of them if not most. While Jews were initially in the Lublin area they were eventually dispersed. Each camp only needed 30 Jews to accomodate the Korherr Jews, or 150 each to accomodate the alleged 6 million.
Image

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 9:42 am
by Nessie
Nazgul wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:26 am
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 8:16 am There is no evidence of over a million Jews being accommodated there, by the end of 1942.
Crap, the Reich had over 40 thousand camps with Jews in many of them if not most. While Jews were initially in the Lublin area they were eventually dispersed. Each camp only needed 30 Jews to accomodate the Korherr Jews, or 150 each to accomodate the alleged 6 million.
Image
You love your dot maps, but you hate to produce any figures for the Jewish populations of the camps. That is because when I looked, I found no information, or reducing populations. For example, Auschwitz had a smaller population in 1944, than in 1943.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/128 ... d-by-year/

In 1943, it was 152,000, but by 1944 it was 114,500 and not all of them were Jewish. You HATE that!!!! No wonder you like your dot maps.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:15 am
by Nazgul
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 9:42 am You love your dot maps, but you hate to produce any figures for the Jewish populations of the camps. That is because when I looked, I found no information, or reducing populations. For example, Auschwitz had a smaller population in 1944, than in 1943.
Each of those dots represents real people who gave information about a camp. You degrade real people, how disgusting. In my post above I said that Jews were outsourced from places (Auschwitz) to other camps where labour was needed, this means the muster must reduce.
One of those dots Skyz Kam which is on an Fplo had a muster of 8000. These camps existed and could have accomodated all the Jews.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:23 am
by Nessie
Nazgul wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:15 am
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 9:42 am You love your dot maps, but you hate to produce any figures for the Jewish populations of the camps. That is because when I looked, I found no information, or reducing populations. For example, Auschwitz had a smaller population in 1944, than in 1943.
Each of those dots represents real people who gave information about a camp. You degrade real people, how disgusting.
I want you to discuss real people, rather than repeatedly showing a dot map. Start discussing the Jewish populations of the camps.
In my post above I said that Jews were outsourced from places (Auschwitz) to other camps where labour was needed, this means the muster must reduce.
One of those dots Skyz Kam which is on an Fplo had a muster of 8000. These camps existed and could have accomodated all the Jews.
I have searched Skyz Kam and cannot find anything. Please show the Jewish population of the camp in 1943 and then 1944.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:37 am
by Nazgul
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:23 am I want you to discuss real people, rather than repeatedly showing a dot map. Start discussing the Jewish populations of the camps.
Each of those dots represents a real camp with the testimony of at least one Jew. The fact that they existed means that they could accomodate millions.
Skarzysko-Kamienna.
I have searched Skyz Kam and cannot find anything. Please show the Jewish population of the camp in 1943 and then 1944.
Skarzysko-Kamienna. Spoken about many times but ignored by you. This proves you have not examined the Fplo documents but just react with inane babble. The camp was established in August 1942 and was liquidated on August 1, 1944. Altogether, 25,000--30,000 Jews were brought to SkarzyskoKamienna.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:56 am
by Nessie
Nazgul wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:37 am
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:23 am I want you to discuss real people, rather than repeatedly showing a dot map. Start discussing the Jewish populations of the camps.
Each of those dots represents a real camp with the testimony of at least one Jew. The fact that they existed means that they could accomodate millions.
You say that and then....
Skarzysko-Kamienna.
I have searched Skyz Kam and cannot find anything. Please show the Jewish population of the camp in 1943 and then 1944.
Skarzysko-Kamienna. Spoken about many times but ignored by you. This proves you have not examined the Fplo documents but just react with inane babble. The camp was established in August 1942 and was liquidated on August 1, 1944. Altogether, 25,000--30,000 Jews were brought to SkarzyskoKamienna.
...you evidence a camp that accommodated Jews, but was closed in 1944. That is consistent with the killing of Jews, not their resettlement. If millions were being resettled, you would produce camps still open in 1944-5, with Jewish populations that had increased between 1942 and 1944.

https://wwv.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Micr ... 206028.pdf

"It was established in August 1942 and was liquidated on August 1, 1944. Altogether, 25,000--30,000 Jews were brought to Skarzysko-Kamienna, and between 18,000--23,000 perished there."

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:01 am
by Nazgul
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:56 am ...you evidence a camp that accommodated Jews, but was closed in 1944. That is consistent with the killing of Jews, not their resettlement. If millions were being resettled, you would produce camps still open in 1944-5, with Jewish populations that had increased between 1942 and 1944.

"It was established in August 1942 and was liquidated on August 1, 1944. Altogether, 25,000--30,000 Jews were brought to Skarzysko-Kamienna, and between 18,000--23,000 perished there."
This was a munitions factory. Similar amounts of people perished in the UK munitions factories due to TNT poisoning not well known at the time. The intention was resettlement but this was not possible due to Soviet incursion. The map above shows the increase in camps and the Western movement.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:21 am
by Nessie
Nazgul wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:01 am
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:56 am ...you evidence a camp that accommodated Jews, but was closed in 1944. That is consistent with the killing of Jews, not their resettlement. If millions were being resettled, you would produce camps still open in 1944-5, with Jewish populations that had increased between 1942 and 1944.

"It was established in August 1942 and was liquidated on August 1, 1944. Altogether, 25,000--30,000 Jews were brought to Skarzysko-Kamienna, and between 18,000--23,000 perished there."
This was a munitions factory. Similar amounts of people perished in the UK munitions factories due to TNT poisoning not well known at the time. The intention was resettlement but this was not possible due to Soviet incursion. The map above shows the increase in camps and the Western movement.
You can start to list those camps and show their Jewish population in 1945. Or will you? I asked you before and you refused, so I started to list them here;

https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=356

I got to a total of c170,000. You made no effort, because you know the answer is not what you want to accept.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:34 am
by Nazgul
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:21 am I got to a total of c170,000. You made no effort, because you know the answer is not what you want to accept.
This would put 4 people per camp. Skyz Kam alone had 8k at any time before they went west. There is a potential in all of the camps Ive shown to house all of the Jews in the Reich. Prove they did not go there with Schmelt und Todt records.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:45 am
by Nessie
Nazgul wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:34 am
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:21 am I got to a total of c170,000. You made no effort, because you know the answer is not what you want to accept.
This would put 4 people per camp. Skyz Kam alone had 8k at any time before they went west. There is a potential in all of the camps Ive shown to house all of the Jews in the Reich. Prove they did not go there with Schmelt und Todt records.
It is up to you to evidence the Jewish population in the camps in 1944-5. You have failed.

https://www.ushmm.org/online/camps-ghet ... _PartB.pdf

If you read the above, you will see camp after camp closing down as the war progressed, the opposite of what would happen if millions of Jews needed accommodating.

Re: The Korherr Report

Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 12:32 pm
by Nazgul
Nessie wrote: Mon Jul 14, 2025 11:45 am
It is up to you to evidence the Jewish population in the camps in 1944-5. You have failed.
You and ilk are claiming mass murder. I have shown the housing potential to accomodate those people. The burden of proof is on you. :lol: