Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

For more adversarial interactions
Post Reply
S
SanityCheck
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:26 pm

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by SanityCheck »

fireofice wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 5:43 am
Archie wrote:yet the median for the believer side is ~ZERO hours of research
Yeah most of my life believing in the holocaust I barely knew anything about it. As a denier I have learned more about the topic than when I accepted it. Is he saying that if one doesn't spend more than 30 hours on the topic, we should be agnostic about the holocaust? That would be an interesting position to hold. I've also heard some mock "deniers" who don't know German for taking a position. Oh so if we don't know German, we should be holocaust agnostic? They back off of that pretty quickly. :lol:
No, I'm saying that continued reading and research past 20-30 hours could well force someone to revise their opinions if they are being honest with themselves.The effort to weigh up sources and interpretations requires a lot longer, going by pretty much all standard metrics from studying either formally or informally.

If someone converts to a contrarian idea after 20-30 hours exposure then they're more likely to stay with that contrarian idea until it ceases to be of personal value to them. That might be discovering a new bright shiny thing or topic du jour which they 'research' or don't in as little time, or some other reason. In the meantime, everything they read will be seen through their priors and explained away to avoid disconfirmation; there are a whole variety of immunisation strategies to help with this.

There are enough cases of mega-enthusiasts for particular conspiracy theories or contrarian enthusiasms admitting much later on that they indulged in them during their youths or a phase of their adulthood, but now see they were wasting their time or were wrong, that one can be skeptical of whether people really can reach a sound conclusion unerringly in just a short space of time.
S
SanityCheck
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:26 pm

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by SanityCheck »

Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:22 pm It's kind of like basing history unironically on black propaganda generated by the Polish Government in Exile, the Soviet, etc. You know?
Black propaganda has a rather specific meaning which is likely not the one you think it does.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_propaganda
Black propaganda is a form of propaganda intended to create the impression that it was created by those it is supposed to discredit. Black propaganda contrasts with gray propaganda, which does not identify its source, as well as white propaganda, which does not disguise its origins at all. It is typically used to vilify or embarrass the enemy through misrepresentation.
Mattogno misuses black propaganda to refer to things that clearly aren't. He's not too hot on defining propaganda in general - intelligence reports aren't prima facie 'propaganda'. Smearing everything as propaganda is itself a propagandistic tactic, as is the innuendo that all propaganda is somehow false.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Stubble »

SanityCheck wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:46 pm
Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:22 pm It's kind of like basing history unironically on black propaganda generated by the Polish Government in Exile, the Soviet, etc. You know?
Black propaganda has a rather specific meaning which is likely not the one you think it does.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_propaganda
Black propaganda is a form of propaganda intended to create the impression that it was created by those it is supposed to discredit. Black propaganda contrasts with gray propaganda, which does not identify its source, as well as white propaganda, which does not disguise its origins at all. It is typically used to vilify or embarrass the enemy through misrepresentation.
Mattogno misuses black propaganda to refer to things that clearly aren't. He's not too hot on defining propaganda in general - intelligence reports aren't prima facie 'propaganda'. Smearing everything as propaganda is itself a propagandistic tactic, as is the innuendo that all propaganda is somehow false.
Perhaps grey propaganda or simply propaganda would be a better term. My operating definition for black propaganda differs from the wikipedia definition, which is fine. I'll just call it propaganda.

Like you say, not all propaganda is false. Another point is that almost all propaganda contains within it kernels of truth.

For example, the steam chambers at treblinka. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that there were steam chambers up the tube at treblinka which were used for delousing operations. I just don't think people were steamed to death in them like lobsters. Another example is the gas vans at chelnmo. I have no doubts 3 delousing vans were situated there and used for delousing operations.

When the vans turn into homicidal gas vans or the steam chambers turn into homicidal vacuum chambers or homicidal gas chambers, that's the propaganda. It's misinformation, not malinformation. That's what I would call black propaganda. Like the dead babies thrown out of incubators or weapons of mass destruction propaganda. There was no real basis for it. I'm not saying that Kuwait didn't have a nicu, I'm saying Iraqi troops didn't throw premature infants on the cold floor and leave them to die.

You get where I'm going with that?

There were no homicidal gas chambers and people didn't burn between 2,000-5,000 corpses on bbq grilles made out of rail road tracks using a cord or 2 of green pine.
User avatar
Archie
Site Admin
Posts: 461
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2024 6:54 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Archie »

HansHill wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 1:38 pm
Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 9:35 am
Tragically, not very. Occasionally someone comes along and breaks new ground, but, usually it is just a tilling of the same ground.

That's part of what I respect about Irving's work, though I may not completely agree with him.

Part of my issue in this specific case is the reliance of the primary literature on demonstrable liars. Use of better primary witnesses would have been a plus.

Here the discussion has been more about demographics and distribution however, and a couple of flys shouldn't spoil the punch. When dealing with these numbers, it is accounting methods, not witnesses, that are at issue.

My remark was simply a lament about the nature of holocaust history. Unfortunately, for the Operation Reinhardt camps, not unlike ancient history, we are left in such a situation. Little to nothing remains in the east, short of a busted tile here or there or the outline of a foundation. That doesn't mean that the entire event should be so constrained. Out of hundreds of thousands it seems like the odd handful of demonstrable liars represent the lion's share of the historical spotlight.

To me, this is part of the tragedy.
Hang on a second - other tragedies can usually be evidenced for a start. I spent the past few days peeling back the onion layers of Sanity Check's sources, and the Wizard of Oz behind the curtain, to evidence mass murder was.... train timetables

Imagine!

>A cataclysmic massacre has just taken place in New York City
>Here is a booklet of ticket stubs as evidence

Unfathomable levels of chutzpah here.
For atrocities committed by a state, if that same state stays in power and is able to control what information gets out, this could be a scenario where the evidence for the atrocities is thin and fragmentary. Certain crimes of the USSR were denied for a long time for these sorts of reasons. But with the Holocaust, there's no excuse. Enemies of the Reich took over all of the relevant territory by the end of the war and captured huge amounts of documents.
Online
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 796
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:22 pm ...Why were the mouths of demonstrable liars chosen to bring us the golden yarn?
Revisionists have not proved that 100% of the witnesses lied about the gassings.
It's kind of like basing history unironically on black propaganda generated by the Polish Government in Exile, the Soviet, etc. You know?
The "etc" is the Nazis, who despite their efforts to destroy evidence, still left mountains of it and admitted to their crimes.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Stubble »

Nessie wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:46 pm
Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:22 pm ...Why were the mouths of demonstrable liars chosen to bring us the golden yarn?
Revisionists have not proved that 100% of the witnesses lied about the gassings.
It's kind of like basing history unironically on black propaganda generated by the Polish Government in Exile, the Soviet, etc. You know?
The "etc" is the Nazis, who despite their efforts to destroy evidence, still left mountains of it and admitted to their crimes.
You misunderstand Nessie, I'm asking why demonstrable liars were chosen to spin the yarn. I can't 100% prove that 100% of the witnesses lied about homicidal gassing, you are right, but, I can 100% prove that many witnesses lied about many things. My question is, where is an honest witness. Is that too much to ask?

To your other point, no, I'm referring to stuff like the black book of Polish jewry and the like. Allied reports like 'death mills'. Things of that nature.
Online
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 796
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:57 pm
Nessie wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:46 pm
Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 2:22 pm ...Why were the mouths of demonstrable liars chosen to bring us the golden yarn?
Revisionists have not proved that 100% of the witnesses lied about the gassings.
It's kind of like basing history unironically on black propaganda generated by the Polish Government in Exile, the Soviet, etc. You know?
The "etc" is the Nazis, who despite their efforts to destroy evidence, still left mountains of it and admitted to their crimes.
You misunderstand Nessie, I'm asking why demonstrable liars were chosen to spin the yarn. I can't 100% prove that 100% of the witnesses lied about homicidal gassing, you are right, but, I can 100% prove that many witnesses lied about many things. My question is, where is an honest witness. Is that too much to ask?
Revisionism's ignorance of witness evidence, memory and recall, causes them to mistakenly believe that there is widespread lying by the witnesses. The main witnesses to gassings are not demonstrable liars spinning a yarn. The Jewish witnesses are emotive, the Nazis more matter of fact, and crucially, they are corroborated. That there is evidence independent of the witnesses, that confirms their main claims, is what determines their truthfulness. How they describe events, is not a reliable indicator of truthfulness.
To your other point, no, I'm referring to stuff like the black book of Polish jewry and the like. Allied reports like 'death mills'. Things of that nature.
That there were atrocity stories, when the Nazis were mass murdering people, is hardly surprising. Revisionists concentrate on those stories, as if that is indicative of all the evidence. That the Nazis are the largest single source of evidence, is significant, but glossed over by revisionists.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Stubble »

Dude, Muller saying he was in the krema for Himmler's visit isn't emotive, it is a fucking lie. He was in the potato commandos at buna at the time.

I can go on and on and on with bullshit like this, from various witnesses, and it doesn't matter because you will carry their water.

There was no extermination campaign. If there had been, they would have killed everyone they got their hands on. Roughly half of the jews in Auschwitz Birkenau were unfit for work, and they were not exterminated. Even if you are just killing 'useless eaters' you would kill thse people, right? But no, they only killed, you know, this group of displaced people or whatever, except for literally everyone sent to an operation Reinhardt camp, they killed all of those people, right? In steam chambers. Or vacuum chambers. Or, something. Maybe it was a submarine motor, right? I think that's what was said before they hung eichmann.
Online
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 796
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 5:07 pm Dude, Muller saying he was in the krema for Himmler's visit isn't emotive, it is a fucking lie. He was in the potato commandos at buna at the time.

I can go on and on and on with bullshit like this, from various witnesses, and it doesn't matter because you will carry their water.
In the police, I interviewed hundreds of witnesses, a job I went on various training courses to do. I spent hours in courts, watching people give evidence. I have looked at many of the studies of witnesses, their memory and how they recollect events.

Your assessment of the witnesses, is wholly inaccurate and is based on your biased desire to disbelieve them, no matter what they say.
There was no extermination campaign. If there had been, they would have killed everyone they got their hands on. Roughly half of the jews in Auschwitz Birkenau were unfit for work, and they were not exterminated. Even if you are just killing 'useless eaters' you would kill thse people, right? But no, they only killed, you know, this group of displaced people or whatever, except for literally everyone sent to an operation Reinhardt camp, they killed all of those people, right? In steam chambers. Or vacuum chambers. Or, something. Maybe it was a submarine motor, right? I think that's what was said before they hung eichmann.
There was no mass resettlement, which there would have needed to be, if millions were not being gassed, or shot. There were no millions in camps in 1944 and liberated in 1945. That number of people would have taken significant resources to accommodate and feed and you cannot even name the Nazi department responsible for such an undertaking. The Allies liberating so many people, would have overwhelmed them. Every country that lost its Jewish population, arrested and deported by the Nazis, would have reported them returning en-mass.

You just look for excuses to disbelieve the evidence for gassings and ignore that millions alive in 1945, would have left a lot of evidence and it left none.
S
SanityCheck
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:26 pm

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by SanityCheck »

Archie wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:22 pm For atrocities committed by a state, if that same state stays in power and is able to control what information gets out, this could be a scenario where the evidence for the atrocities is thin and fragmentary. Certain crimes of the USSR were denied for a long time for these sorts of reasons. But with the Holocaust, there's no excuse. Enemies of the Reich took over all of the relevant territory by the end of the war and captured huge amounts of documents.
It doesn't take terribly long to begin a cover-up, since Globocnik managed this 17-18 months before the end of the war:
In a letter dated January 5, 1944, the Higher SS and Police Leader Odilo Globocnik, addressed Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler regarding the economic settlement of Operation Reinhardt (Aktion Reinhard). The letter was submitted in response to Himmler’s order from September 22, 1943, which requested its completion by December 31, 1943. He outlined the two-part structure of the accounting of the “economic part of Operation Reinhardt… a) accounting and delivery of confiscated valuables and b) accounting of values generated from labor”. Globocnik also stressed that “With the entire accounting of Reinhardt, it must also be noted that their documents must be destroyed as soon as possible since the documents of all other works in this matter have already been destroyed.”
https://holocausthistory.site/1944-01-0 ... destroyed/
Report by Odilo Globocnik on the “economic part of Operation Reinhardt” enclosed in his letter of January 5, 1944 to Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler. The report is divided into four sections: the “resettlement” of Jewish populations, the exploitation of forced labor, the utilization material assets, and the acquisition of hidden values, including real estate. Regarding the Operation Reinhard extermination camps Treblinka, Belzec, and Sobibor the report notes that “the facilities built for this operation from accruing funds … have been entirely removed. For monitoring reasons, a small farm has been established in each camp, manned by a specialist”.
https://holocausthistory.site/1944-01-0 ... y-removed/


The cover-up failed to catch everything, but the dearth of documents about Aktion Reinhardt is considerably more extreme than the survival of documents about Auschwitz (many 10s of 1000s of pages in the Zentralbauleitung archive overlooked in an offsite) or Chelmno (files within a million pages of the Gettoverwaltung Litzmannstadt records, among other collections).

Destruction of German records within the military, SS, Police and civilian agencies was not inconsiderable, and is basically why the 'demand German documents' routine is not going to be listened to. The Nazis and their postwar fluffers forfeited the right to insist that posterity should rely solely on their records by destroying so much.

And yet the surviving fragments plus fortuitous survivals of this or that set of files mean that Holocaust deniers have had to resort to all kinds of forgery allegations.

I've hashed out how one can infer extermination at the Reinhard camps from the German paper trail alone often enough that I'm not going to do it again, but the main thing is acknowledging there ARE documents about gassing for Chelmno, other gas vans and Auschwitz, as well as the euthanasia program and some other KZs, so given that the forgery allegations haven't been persuasive, this explains the no doubt maddening mainstream indifference to the narrow-to-Treblinka-and-chortle routine from 'revisionists', especially since the annihilation of the Jews in the Government-General was referred to on multiple occasions in Hans Frank's official diary, so from Nuremberg onwards the question of *extermination* in the GG has been settled.
S
SanityCheck
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2024 8:26 pm

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by SanityCheck »

Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:10 pm When the vans turn into homicidal gas vans or the steam chambers turn into homicidal vacuum chambers or homicidal gas chambers, that's the propaganda. It's misinformation, not malinformation. That's what I would call black propaganda. Like the dead babies thrown out of incubators or weapons of mass destruction propaganda. There was no real basis for it. I'm not saying that Kuwait didn't have a nicu, I'm saying Iraqi troops didn't throw premature infants on the cold floor and leave them to die.
No, black propaganda has a very precise definition, which does not fit the Kuwait incubators example since that came from a Kuwaiti testifying to the US Congress, not from a purported Iraqi government source.

Black propaganda must be passed off as coming from the opposition, end of story. In WWII this was exemplified by Sefton Delmer's Soldatensender Calais, a British run radio station purporting to be a German military radio station in France.

Fake leaflets and fake posters were also used - the Polish underground used these against German troops in occupied Poland. Some of this verged on the humorous, to post up placards mimicking German ordinances with different content.

Attributing a report to a named opposition source (newspaper) even if first publicising it in your own media would verge on black propaganda, but technically still isn't (it is misinformation). One needs to have fully attributed the medium to the other side - which can of course include the famous postage stamps of Himmler put into circulation, these were clearly being purported as proper German stamps

A defector would not count as black propaganda: if someone defects from a country or from one political party to another, they are now speaking out because they switched sides.

A prisoner interrogation isn't black propaganda
A captured document isn't black propaganda.

Roosevelt presented a false map in 1941 supposedly proving Nazi designs on Latin America. That, too, isn't black propaganda because *Roosevelt* presented it, the provenance wasn't from a Nazi mouthpiece.

Note that this example as well as the Kuwaiti incubators testimony shows one can still call out false propaganda and misinformation.

Disinformation in the Soviet KGB sense of dezinformatsiia tended to be grey propaganda, laundered through non-Soviet mouthpieces.

Neither black propaganda nor disinformation apply to the Holocaust, I'm afraid, since the wartime reports were openly attributable to specific mouthpieces, i.e. the Polish underground, Polish Jewish underground and Soviet underground going to governments (in exile) and NGOs, and were accompanied by numerous other reports through diplomatic, intelligence and religious channels, plus masses of letters, diaries and manuscripts which were not publicised at all.

Since Chelmno was the first reported with gas via gas vans, the fuss over steam chambers is especially stupid, apparently a well thought out 'propaganda' campaign was derailed because of misperceptions and misdescriptions. Occam's razor implies that early reports of steam were simply accounts from a greater distance or less time learning that the gas chambers at Treblinka operated with engine exhaust, since steam is a gas. The contrary claim that these were 'only' disinfection chambers and that hundreds of thousands of deportees went somewhere else is a more convoluted explanation and lacks corroboration, while failing to account for all other aspects of the reports from Treblinka fugitives mentioning steam, or the other reports from other fugitives which were clearer about gas.

As much as you might like the extra sinister sound of 'black propaganda', please don't be as mentally crippled as Mattogno and stop misusing the term.
User avatar
TlsMS93
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 11:57 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by TlsMS93 »

In the Holocaust, no department was in charge, as Raul Hilberg said, nor was there a budget. So demanding from us which department took care of this is counterproductive in the matter. Which department took care of the expulsion of 14 million Germans in the post-war period? If not, then were they gassed and cremated and did they destroy the evidence as well?
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Stubble »

SanityCheck wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 8:13 pm
Stubble wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 3:10 pm When the vans turn into homicidal gas vans or the steam chambers turn into homicidal vacuum chambers or homicidal gas chambers, that's the propaganda. It's misinformation, not malinformation. That's what I would call black propaganda. Like the dead babies thrown out of incubators or weapons of mass destruction propaganda. There was no real basis for it. I'm not saying that Kuwait didn't have a nicu, I'm saying Iraqi troops didn't throw premature infants on the cold floor and leave them to die.
No, black propaganda has a very precise definition, which does not fit the Kuwait incubators example since that came from a Kuwaiti testifying to the US Congress, not from a purported Iraqi government source.

Black propaganda must be passed off as coming from the opposition, end of story. In WWII this was exemplified by Sefton Delmer's Soldatensender Calais, a British run radio station purporting to be a German military radio station in France.

Fake leaflets and fake posters were also used - the Polish underground used these against German troops in occupied Poland. Some of this verged on the humorous, to post up placards mimicking German ordinances with different content.

Attributing a report to a named opposition source (newspaper) even if first publicising it in your own media would verge on black propaganda, but technically still isn't (it is misinformation). One needs to have fully attributed the medium to the other side - which can of course include the famous postage stamps of Himmler put into circulation, these were clearly being purported as proper German stamps

A defector would not count as black propaganda: if someone defects from a country or from one political party to another, they are now speaking out because they switched sides.

A prisoner interrogation isn't black propaganda
A captured document isn't black propaganda.

Roosevelt presented a false map in 1941 supposedly proving Nazi designs on Latin America. That, too, isn't black propaganda because *Roosevelt* presented it, the provenance wasn't from a Nazi mouthpiece.

Note that this example as well as the Kuwaiti incubators testimony shows one can still call out false propaganda and misinformation.

Disinformation in the Soviet KGB sense of dezinformatsiia tended to be grey propaganda, laundered through non-Soviet mouthpieces.

Neither black propaganda nor disinformation apply to the Holocaust, I'm afraid, since the wartime reports were openly attributable to specific mouthpieces, i.e. the Polish underground, Polish Jewish underground and Soviet underground going to governments (in exile) and NGOs, and were accompanied by numerous other reports through diplomatic, intelligence and religious channels, plus masses of letters, diaries and manuscripts which were not publicised at all.

Since Chelmno was the first reported with gas via gas vans, the fuss over steam chambers is especially stupid, apparently a well thought out 'propaganda' campaign was derailed because of misperceptions and misdescriptions. Occam's razor implies that early reports of steam were simply accounts from a greater distance or less time learning that the gas chambers at Treblinka operated with engine exhaust, since steam is a gas. The contrary claim that these were 'only' disinfection chambers and that hundreds of thousands of deportees went somewhere else is a more convoluted explanation and lacks corroboration, while failing to account for all other aspects of the reports from Treblinka fugitives mentioning steam, or the other reports from other fugitives which were clearer about gas.

As much as you might like the extra sinister sound of 'black propaganda', please don't be as mentally crippled as Mattogno and stop misusing the term.
I believe I addressed all of that in my first paragraph, let me check.

Oh, I did...

'Perhaps grey propaganda or simply propaganda would be a better term. My operating definition for black propaganda differs from the wikipedia definition, which is fine. I'll just call it propaganda.

Like you say, not all propaganda is false. Another point is that almost all propaganda contains within it kernels of truth.'

Thanks for ignoring that part of my post in your quote though.
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 420
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Stubble »

TlsMS93 wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 8:27 pm In the Holocaust, no department was in charge, as Raul Hilberg said, nor was there a budget. So demanding from us which department took care of this is counterproductive in the matter. Which department took care of the expulsion of 14 million Germans in the post-war period? If not, then were they gassed and cremated and did they destroy the evidence as well?
In Rhine Meadow if I recall correctly, yes.
N
Numar Patru
Posts: 285
Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2024 1:39 am

Re: Exterminationist Tactics - part 2

Post by Numar Patru »

TlsMS93 wrote: Thu Jan 09, 2025 8:27 pm In the Holocaust, no department was in charge, as Raul Hilberg said
Not only did Hilberg not say that, but in so far as the SS -- or really the Reichssicherhauptamt -- could be considered a "department," there was a "department" in charge of it.
nor was there a budget
Wrong again. The whole point of the SS-Wirtschaftsverwaltungshauptamt was financing operations for the SS, including concentration camps.
Which department took care of the expulsion of 14 million Germans in the post-war period?
Considering that it was more than one country doing the expelling, it seems clear that there was at least one department in each separate country in charge of the matter. It wasn't spontaneous.
If not, then were they gassed and cremated and did they destroy the evidence as well?
Well, no, because the expellees by and large ended up in Germany and can be accounted for. A member of the second generation of those expellees is a certain man named {checks notes} Germar Rudolf. So, yeah, not like 1.5 million just up and disappeared.
Post Reply