Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2153
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Fri Jul 11, 2025 5:01 pm 3 maps. 2 from '45, 1 from '46, all collaborative witness maps. Huh, another collaborative map, with 4 pits, indicated in the same spot...

Something to note, the pits have grown a little by '46 and aren't in the precise spot anymore, as you get later the maps get less and less in line with the GPR. This seems to bear out Nessie's observation about witnesses. The more contemporary the map, the closer to reality it is.
All the maps, all the witnesses and the archaeological surveys agree, the main mass graves were in the south eastern part of the camp.
Online
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by Stubble »

And all of the maps indicate that the Mediterranean is situated between Europe and Africa. That doesn't mean you get to start grabbing the black sea, the Caspian sea and any lakes in Europe and add them to the Mediterranean Nessie.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2153
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Sat Jul 12, 2025 1:38 pm And all of the maps indicate that the Mediterranean is situated between Europe and Africa. That doesn't mean you get to start grabbing the black sea, the Caspian sea and any lakes in Europe and add them to the Mediterranean Nessie.
All of the evidence for mass graves, relates to the south eastern part of the camp, or the Lazarete area. I am not trying to add in evidence from any other location.
Online
User avatar
Stubble
Posts: 1778
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2024 10:43 am

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by Stubble »

I was surprised to see you confine your asserted grave space to the 'extermination area', and I will give you credit for that Nessie.

Where I'm standing, the alleged pits are g51-g54. Witnesses described 4 pits, gpr returned 4 hits. You think 3 teams of witnesses forgot to mark what you assume are the biggest graves.

I even maximized the grave space by treating the pits as cylinders and packing them absolutely to the brim excluding top layer or any layers at all between bodies. I did that because, we have no data on what is in any of these pits.

I'm waiting for the 2024 study, and I think you may be losing g50, because I think they dug and catalogued it. When they publish, if they ever do, we will know for sure.

The presence of concrete and jagged rocks as memorials to me is a tell that what is alleged in these various mass murder sites is not what is claimed. The only purpose I can see for them is to prevent non invasive testing and to leave the question open.

Ultimately, a lot of jews are missing, you can't point to them in the ground at the camps, and I can't point to them in another place alive. One of us is wrong.

It looks like it might be time to bump the Belzec 'Own Goal' thread (Kola study) and to start a Sobibor thread. I'm going to stick a fork in this one.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
User avatar
Nessie
Posts: 2153
Joined: Sat Sep 28, 2024 7:41 am

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by Nessie »

Stubble wrote: Sat Jul 12, 2025 2:36 pm I was surprised to see you confine your asserted grave space to the 'extermination area', and I will give you credit for that Nessie.
Have you ever seen me claim mass graves, in an area, where there is no evidence of mass graves? The answer is no.
Where I'm standing, the alleged pits are g51-g54. Witnesses described 4 pits, gpr returned 4 hits. You think 3 teams of witnesses forgot to mark what you assume are the biggest graves.
Please name and quote the witnesses who said there were 4 mass graves in the main grave area.

Where is your evidence that G50 is a tank trap, which has no corpses or cremated remains buried in it?
I even maximized the grave space by treating the pits as cylinders and packing them absolutely to the brim excluding top layer or any layers at all between bodies. I did that because, we have no data on what is in any of these pits.

I'm waiting for the 2024 study, and I think you may be losing g50, because I think they dug and catalogued it. When they publish, if they ever do, we will know for sure.
The links I can find to the 2024 study, make no mention of such an excavation;

https://muzeumtreblinka.eu/en/2024/07/0 ... tion-camp/
https://eng.pw.edu.pl/News/Scientists-i ... ation-Camp
The presence of concrete and jagged rocks as memorials to me is a tell that what is alleged in these various mass murder sites is not what is claimed. The only purpose I can see for them is to prevent non invasive testing and to leave the question open.
There is a lot of evidence of grave robbing, not just at TII, which has prompted the memorials to prevent such.
Ultimately, a lot of jews are missing, you can't point to them in the ground at the camps, and I can't point to them in another place alive. One of us is wrong.
I can point to them in the ground, you just chose to ignore, or minimise that evidence. You cannot point to them alive in another place.
It looks like it might be time to bump the Belzec 'Own Goal' thread (Kola study) and to start a Sobibor thread. I'm going to stick a fork in this one.
Image

What was that about Jews preventing excavations?
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by HansHill »

Nessie wrote: Sat Jul 12, 2025 3:03 pm
What was that about Jews preventing excavations?
Nice Try

Image
User avatar
HansHill
Posts: 713
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:06 pm
Location: Arlen, TX

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by HansHill »

Another very important aspect was the observance of aspects of Halakhic law. During the work, we were supported by a representative of the Rabbinical Commission for Jewish Cemeteries. This meant that the research conducted differed from any archaeological research conducted in Poland and abroad.
1 - they were looking for gas chambers
2 - they needed to observe Jewish laws and customs

**edit**

Link

https://eng.pw.edu.pl/News/Scientists-i ... ation-Camp
K
Keen
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by Keen »

Stubble wrote: Sat Jul 12, 2025 2:36 pm
Ultimately, a lot of jews are missing, you can't point to them in the ground at the camps...
Nessie:

[All the maps, all the witnesses and the archaeological surveys agree, the main mass graves were in the south eastern part of the camp.] I can point to them in the ground...
Here's your chance to shine then Nessie:

* The 15 so-called “scientifically proven” mass graves of Treblinka II are shown and numbered in the maps in this link here:

(#1/86 though #15/100 of the alleged 100)

https://vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=229 ... count=2843

(#1/86 though #15/100 of the alleged 100)

Since we can't actually see you point, and since we don't have magic glasses like you do, please tell us the numbers of the graves that you are pointing to.
Last edited by Keen on Sat Jul 12, 2025 8:45 pm, edited 2 times in total.
K
Keen
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2025 1:27 pm

Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II

Post by Keen »

Nessie wrote: Fri Jul 11, 2025 2:19 pm Image

The yellow are the pits GPR located...
Are you talking about the areas labled as "probable pits" Nessie?

https://vnnforum.com/attachment.php?att ... 1524614037
pit
[pit]

noun

a large hole in the ground.
What exactly is a "probable large hole in the ground"?

I mean, there is either a "large hole" or not - right?

Does one need a pair of your magic glasses to see these alleged "large holes in the ground" Nessie?

Image

Just how hard can it be to prove the existence of a "large hole in the ground"?

Or are you alleging that there used to be "large holes in the ground" in those areas, but then someone filled them in?

If that is the case, then where did the soil come from that was used to fill in these alleged "large holes"?

Are you suggesting that the remains of tens of thousands of magically disappearing jews were dug out of "large holes in the ground" and then shoveled back in, without anyone documenting such an event?

Where did the people who excavated these magically disappearing jews get their magic glasses? I mean, one would need a pair of magic glasses to excavate magically disappearing jews, wouldn't one?

That reminds me Nessie:

Is it - True. - or - False. - that; If 7 graves contained the bones and teeth of 925,000 jews - then each grave would contain, on average, the remains of 132,143 jews - ??

IV - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Covering millions upon millions of pounds of bones and teeth with “a thick layer of sand” makes them magically disappear - ??

5 - In total, how many single, disconnected human teeth have been tangibly discovered within the 15 Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question: __?__.

10 - List all of the Treblinka II graves / cremation pits in question that you can conclusively prove actually exist and currently contain at least an iota of human remains: __?__.
Post Reply