Nessie, we aren't moving the thread forward and we aren't going to change each other's point of view. Since if I respond directly to your last post, we will go in another circle, I won't, instead, let me refer you to our previous circles for my rebut. Rest assured, I think you are dead wrong.
To continue prattling at one another in this thread is an exercise in social masturbation, without the payoff.
Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II
Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II
The maps corroborate the archaeological evidence, by placing the mass graves in the same two locations inside the camp, locations that when surveyed found pits and when excavated found cremains. All the witnesses also locate the mass graves in the same area. That corroborating evidence, proves mass graves.Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 3:53 pm Nessie, we aren't moving the thread forward and we aren't going to change each other's point of view. Since if I respond directly to your last post, we will go in another circle, I won't, instead, let me refer you to our previous circles for my rebut. Rest assured, I think you are dead wrong.
To continue prattling at one another in this thread is an exercise in social masturbation, without the payoff.
Your attempts to claim I am somehow wrong about that, are failures. You are not swayed by evidence you do not want to accept, so that leaves you stuck thinking that you can argue there are no mass graves consistent with the mass murder of hundreds of thousands of Jews. You dodge my point that you cannot argue there are no such mass graves, you have to evidence there are none. You cannot do that.
Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II
Nessie, when I say that there are 4 mass graves evidenced in the camp indicated by the best contemporary maps available, verified by the GPR/LIDAR, I'm not saying there are no mass graves.
When I say the grave behind the hospital is not crammed full of dead bodies, that is conjecture on my part, even that however, does not somehow make it not a mass grave.
People are buried at Treblinka II. In mass graves. Disagreement about how they got there doesn't make them not there.
We aren't arguing about the existence of mass graves, we are arguing about the placement of mass graves and about why you think there are 7 of them when the best contemporary maps indicate 4 or 5.
Bless your heart, that's really all I can say.
We've also already been over this, repeatedly.
It is not serving the thread or the forum for us to continue to beat this very, very dead horse.
(It took 18 pages for the thread to actually get to the point of even trying to establish the grave space, which I noticed months ago looking at these maps was roughly the size of a thimble for >850,000 people, and ever since Nessie kindly pointed out the map corresponded to 4 targets on the GPR/LIDAR, all he has done is try to include more grave space and say I was denying the existence of mass graves, I just want to make that clear for the future in case readers want a condensed version without having to scroll through all of the pages of the thread)
When I say the grave behind the hospital is not crammed full of dead bodies, that is conjecture on my part, even that however, does not somehow make it not a mass grave.
People are buried at Treblinka II. In mass graves. Disagreement about how they got there doesn't make them not there.
We aren't arguing about the existence of mass graves, we are arguing about the placement of mass graves and about why you think there are 7 of them when the best contemporary maps indicate 4 or 5.
Bless your heart, that's really all I can say.
We've also already been over this, repeatedly.
It is not serving the thread or the forum for us to continue to beat this very, very dead horse.
(It took 18 pages for the thread to actually get to the point of even trying to establish the grave space, which I noticed months ago looking at these maps was roughly the size of a thimble for >850,000 people, and ever since Nessie kindly pointed out the map corresponded to 4 targets on the GPR/LIDAR, all he has done is try to include more grave space and say I was denying the existence of mass graves, I just want to make that clear for the future in case readers want a condensed version without having to scroll through all of the pages of the thread)
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II
Except it's not really about revisionists "not working out" how something can be possible, is it Nessie? But rather than the explanations given don't demonstrate possibility, isn't it Nessie?
In this thread, Stubble and others have run you ragged on the grave-space conundrum and your answers are very weak. You are hesitant to address the actual critiques:
1) Show us where the 750,000 bodies-as-bodies were buried, and
2) Show us where the 750,000 bodies-as-ash are currently buried
If your two areas are concentric circles due to loss of mass from the incineration process, please explain this. If the areas are identical, please also explain this. I know you won't explain this, and I know you are cornered and so will retreat to """I can't work it out""" therefore you don't need to answer it.
Remember: you have chosen to defend this farce. You opt-in every time you log into Codoh or Twitter. Part of your entry price for this self-imposed opt-in is to defend the indefensible. We're waiting for something substantial.
In this thread, Stubble and others have run you ragged on the grave-space conundrum and your answers are very weak. You are hesitant to address the actual critiques:
1) Show us where the 750,000 bodies-as-bodies were buried, and
2) Show us where the 750,000 bodies-as-ash are currently buried
If your two areas are concentric circles due to loss of mass from the incineration process, please explain this. If the areas are identical, please also explain this. I know you won't explain this, and I know you are cornered and so will retreat to """I can't work it out""" therefore you don't need to answer it.
Remember: you have chosen to defend this farce. You opt-in every time you log into Codoh or Twitter. Part of your entry price for this self-imposed opt-in is to defend the indefensible. We're waiting for something substantial.
Online
Well then:
Re: Archaeological Evidence of Mass Graves at Treblinka II
4 mass graves at Treblink II huh?Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Jul 10, 2025 4:24 pm Nessie, when I say that there are 4 mass graves evidenced in the camp indicated by the best contemporary maps available, verified by the GPR/LIDAR, I'm not saying there are no mass graves.
When I say the grave behind the hospital is not crammed full of dead bodies, that is conjecture on my part, even that however, does not somehow make it not a mass grave.
People are buried at Treblinka II. In mass graves. Disagreement about how they got there doesn't make them not there.
We aren't arguing about the existence of mass graves, we are arguing about the placement of mass graves and about why you think there are 7 of them when the best contemporary maps indicate 4 or 5.
Bless your heart, that's really all I can say.
We've also already been over this, repeatedly.
It is not serving the thread or the forum for us to continue to beat this very, very dead horse.
(It took 18 pages for the thread to actually get to the point of even trying to establish the grave space, which I noticed months ago looking at these maps was roughly the size of a thimble for >850,000 people, and ever since Nessie kindly pointed out the map corresponded to 4 targets on the GPR/LIDAR, all he has done is try to include more grave space and say I was denying the existence of mass graves, I just want to make that clear for the future in case readers want a condensed version without having to scroll through all of the pages of the thread)
Well then:
Why do people continue to try to "evidence" the existence of something that has already been legally proven to not exist?Executive Summary: It is alleged in orthodox historiography that, during WW II, hundreds upon hundreds of thousands of corpses were buried in numerous “huge mass graves” at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II. However, despite all the deceptive allegations to the contrary, the truth is, the largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the one hundred graves / cremation pits that are fraudulently alleged to have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at these sites, in which verified human remains have been tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology, contained the remains of - ONLY FIVE PEOPLE.
...
A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 100 alleged graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain, or to have been collected from, the remains of - at least 2 people.
...
CONCLUSION / STATEMENT OF FACT: Applying legal standards used in U.S. courts along with the information presented on this website, Greg Gerdes has LEGALLY PROVEN that the above alleged “huge mass grave discoveries” are fraudulent charades, the Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II mass murder / holocaust allegations are false, and the orthodox holocaust story did not happen as alleged.
NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE - PROVES - NO MASS MURDER
Additionally, and independent of any other reward offered on this website, a reward of - $5,000.00 - will be remitted to anyone who can refute the above conclusion / statement of fact in a publicized debate against Greg Gerdes. Rules are essentially the same as those for the other challenges on this site. Contact Greg Gerdes for details.
https://thisisaboutscience.com/