Page 2 of 2

Re: HD seemingly allowed on X/Twitter

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 3:18 am
by Fred Ziffel
On X, if you can take a dump on their thinking and beliefs even do it in a civil manner, they cannot lash out with any coherent facts or common sense of their own, their ego is damage, and they get back at you by reporting you to whomever and wala I am back on Gab. I think that is what happened to me

I once responded to a post of someone talking about gas chambers at Majdanek and asked them to show me what this gas chamber looked like since there were 7 claimed (actually 8). after a few back and forths, he or she refused to send a photo of a Majdanek gas chamber (Perhaps the person felt I was setting them up to get pounced on, and they were correct) I sent a photo of the B41 a once claimed gas chamber showing 6 windows. the person still defended it with some dumb argument as a gas chamber and called me all names and blocked me. I will attach photo in question here if interested

These are the types you need to watch out for on X. Most of all, since they have advantage over you using big brother X's threat of suspension over you. I often used this quote for these type of people.

Re: HD seemingly allowed on X/Twitter

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 10:43 am
by TlsMS93
Fred Ziffel wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 3:18 am On X, if you can take a dump on their thinking and beliefs even do it in a civil manner, they cannot lash out with any coherent facts or common sense of their own, their ego is damage, and they get back at you by reporting you to whomever and wala I am back on Gab. I think that is what happened to me

I once responded to a post of someone talking about gas chambers at Majdanek and asked them to show me what this gas chamber looked like since there were 7 claimed (actually 8). after a few back and forths, he or she refused to send a photo of a Majdanek gas chamber (Perhaps the person felt I was setting them up to get pounced on, and they were correct) I sent a photo of the B41 a once claimed gas chamber showing 6 windows. the person still defended it with some dumb argument as a gas chamber and called me all names and blocked me. I will attach photo in question here if interested

These are the types you need to watch out for on X. Most of all, since they have advantage over you using big brother X's threat of suspension over you. I often used this quote for these type of people.
They don't like this photograph today, obviously, but they didn't protest when Night and Fog aired. But why is revisionism so attacked when the Holocaust today is so different from the Holocaust back then? Are they the only ones who have the right to revisit this event?

It's funny that “Bath, Disinfection 2” is not available to tourists. Is it because it would expose the changes they made to the first one?

Re: HD seemingly allowed on X/Twitter

Posted: Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:57 pm
by Fred Ziffel
Not all of Bad 2 is off limits since 2021. Some you can see from where you are able to enter but cannot see all. You can look in the window and see the boiler room

Re: HD seemingly allowed on X/Twitter

Posted: Fri Jan 31, 2025 5:05 pm
by Hektor
Archie wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2025 1:30 am
Fred Ziffel wrote: Tue Jan 28, 2025 9:23 am Yours truely was suspended a few weeks ago for talking about Crem 1 construction history. I was very civil but now gone
Too bad. That surprises me. From what I can tell the bannings are very inconsistent. It seems they allow a lot of overtly racist posting. But then some well-behaved accounts will get banned. As I recall, your posts were technical/factual in nature and not inflammatory at all.

Overall, the enforcement against HD still seems lax/inconsistent.
Targeted reporting can get you banned for almost anything. But they need to get aware of you and then go against a post in some sort of pack behavior.


Indeed matters can be discussed more openly now.

The approach should be also an indirect one. Pointing people to the conclusion that there is obviously something wrong with the narrative. Just telling them will only trigger a counter-argument and they become ego-defensive (They feel stupid for having believed it).