Page 8 of 8
Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:04 pm
by Keen
bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:24 pm
Keen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:15 pm
bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:11 pm
As a discovered mass grave
I don't believe that any mass graves have been discovered at Belzec.
But you allege that they have:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??
bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
because I don't think Kola was incompetent at his job or lying , though it's possible he was
bombsaway, you have made the following allegation:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??
bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:07 pm
by bombsaway
Keen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:04 pm
bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:24 pm
Keen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:15 pm
I don't believe that any mass graves have been discovered at Belzec.
But you allege that they have:
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
because I don't think Kola was incompetent at his job or lying , though it's possible he was
bombsaway, you have made the following allegation:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??
bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
I guess we could say the archeologists claim to have discovered graves, and I believe them. You don't. That's ok but that's the end of the line for us.
Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:11 pm
by Keen
bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:07 pm
Keen wrote: ↑Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:04 pm
bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Jul 14, 2025 5:24 pm
because I don't think Kola was incompetent at his job or lying , though it's possible he was
bombsaway, you have made the following allegation:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??
bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
I guess we could say the archeologists claim to have discovered graves, and I believe them. You don't. That's ok but that's the end of the line for us.
bombsaway, you have made the following allegation:
H - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; Mass graves have actually been discovered by archaeologists / forensic investigators at Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - ??
bombsaway: True.
Can you substantiate that allegation - Yes. - or - No. - ??
Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:29 pm
by Keen
bombsaway:
That's the end of the line for us.
You're running away already?
But bombsaway, you didn't even prove the existence of one grave.
Not one!
Oh well:
Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?
Posted: Mon Jul 14, 2025 10:02 pm
by bombsaway
So what? Are the "graves" proven to not exist?