The CODOH Revisionist Forum

I'm going to get a bunny and call a pest control company.

Anybody that wants to kick in for this, feel free.

For the record, a professional's opinion doesn't matter, because it is evidenced.

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 2:05 am I'm going to get a bunny and call a pest control company.

Anybody that wants to kick in for this, feel free.

For the record, a professional's opinion doesn't matter, because it is evidenced.

You can't even get Zyklon or its equivalent anymore nowadays. But do it with the hydrocyanic acid "pot method" - such as used to be done in USA gas chambers.

Or just refer to those USA gassings. THOSE persons DID end up dying, right?

Ah, but that isn't technically Zyklon now that I think about it.

We're all SOL for proving it to you. No Zyklon anymore.

Then why do we produce 1.1 million tons annually?

https://www.e-mj.com/features/the-curre ... gulations/

If I understand correctly, it is used for industrial pest control here in the states.

Again, I'll talk to a pest control company about this.

I have also heard that immigration is using hydrogen cyanide as a fumigant on the boarder and they are ordering it through 'calgas' who is getting it from Brazil. All that is popping up is FEMA conspiracy theory stuff going back to 2011 though. I could have sworn I saw it reported from 'the guardian' around 2020 after Biden assumed office.

/shrug

What's the worst thing the pest control company can tell me, no?

This would be easier if I lived in Australia, they use 'blue fume' around Melbourne.

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 2:47 am Then why do we produce 1.1 million tons annually?

https://www.e-mj.com/features/the-curre ... gulations/

If I understand correctly, it is used for industrial pest control here in the states.

Again, I'll talk to a pest control company about this.

I have also heard that immigration is using hydrogen cyanide as a fumigant on the boarder and they are ordering it through 'calgas' who is getting it from Brazil. All that is popping up is FEMA conspiracy theory stuff going back to 2011 though. I could have sworn I saw it reported from 'the guardian' around 2020 after Biden assumed office.

/shrug

What's the worst thing the pest control company can tell me, no?

This would be easier if I lived in Australia, they use 'blue fume' around Melbourne.

Yes, hydrogen cyanide - not Zyklon.

Cyanosil (the equivalent of Zyklon) was sold until about 2010 or so.

HCN is not used much for pesticides anymore. Other things tend to be better suited. I think the Japanese still use hydrocyanic acid to fumigate their imported bananas, though.

EDIT: Your linked article didn't mention fumigation usage.

I immediately recognized your video and therefore didn't watch it again. Do I really have to point out the silliness of it? Do you understand the outgassing curves you yourself posted?

From memory, off the top of my head, they went into a room like 10 m3 or so on a hot day with 1 kg can of Cyanosil (meaning 1 kg of HCN), right? 300 ppm is rapidly fatal. How long do you think it'd take to reach 300 ppm with 1 kg HCN in that hot little room?

Just an argument from incredulity...

It is evidenced. It obviously happened. All the eyewitnesses agree.

Are you saying it's a hoax? Where's your evidence!

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 2:05 am I'm going to get a bunny and call a pest control company.

Anybody that wants to kick in for this, feel free.

For the record, a professional's opinion doesn't matter, because it is evidenced.

Evidence is key, yes. It does beat opinion. Kula columns are evidenced. Opinion it is all lies, loses.

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 4:17 am Just an argument from incredulity...

Arguing that Kula columns are too incredible to believe, therefore all the witnesses to columns being installed inside the Kremas lied, is the argument from incredulity.

It is evidenced. It obviously happened. All the eyewitnesses agree.

There is corroborating evidence from eyewitnesses that there were columns inside the Leichenkellers. They vary in how they describe the columns, but they are clearly describing a tall metal structure with holes that Zyklon B was poured into.

Are you saying it's a hoax? Where's your evidence!

Indeed, revisionists seem to think that their expressions of doubt are exempt from being evidenced.

Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:20 am

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 2:05 am I'm going to get a bunny and call a pest control company.

Anybody that wants to kick in for this, feel free.

For the record, a professional's opinion doesn't matter, because it is evidenced.

Evidence is key, yes. It does beat opinion. Kula columns are evidenced. Opinion it is all lies, loses.

When the evidence consists of changing words, assuming inventory is wrong and taking documents completely out of context, color me surprised when you call that evidenced.

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:35 am

Nessie wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:20 am

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 2:05 am I'm going to get a bunny and call a pest control company.

Anybody that wants to kick in for this, feel free.

For the record, a professional's opinion doesn't matter, because it is evidenced.

Evidence is key, yes. It does beat opinion. Kula columns are evidenced. Opinion it is all lies, loses.

When the evidence consists of changing words, assuming inventory is wrong and taking documents completely out of context, color me surprised when you call that evidenced.

The witness descriptions and the document are close enough in description, that they are referring to the same thing, so that evidence corroborates and so proves the existence of columns used to drop Zyklon B into the Liechenkellers. The context is of evidence of Nazis dropping Zyklon B through holes in the Krema roof to gas people in a chamber below.

Metal mesh devices do not fit into the context of revisionist theories about corpse storage, showering, bomb shelters or delousing and those theories are not evidenced to have happened.

What holes?

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 10:47 amWhat holes?

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/T ... 586e05dcaa

Odd that they are missing in the September 13th set, eh?

Also odd that everyone said they couldn't find the holes when you are so incredibly sure that these ruin access holes, which are in the wrong places, are the corresponding holes, eh?

Also odd that the Germans lacked the ability to cut rebar apparently and just bent it out of the way, eh?

Hmmm

Stubble wrote: ↑Wed Jan 15, 2025 3:28 pm

Odd that they are missing in the September 13th set, eh?

Also odd that everyone said they couldn't find the holes when you are so incredibly sure that these ruin access holes, which are in the wrong places, are the corresponding holes, eh?

Also odd that the Germans lacked the ability to cut rebar apparently and just bent it out of the way, eh?

Hmmm

What evidential value has your opinion?

Why do you rely so heavily on thinking things are odd, when that is the logical fallacy of argument from incredulity?

That's not the fallacy of incredulity.

HansHill wrote: ↑Thu Jan 16, 2025 10:37 am That's not the fallacy of incredulity.

Definitions of the fallacy;

"The fallacy of appeal to personal incredulity is committed when the arguer presumes that whatever is true must be easy to understand or to imagine."

"Concluding that because you can't or refuse to believe something, it must not be true, improbable, or the argument must be flawed."

"Because you found something difficult to understand, or are unaware of how it works, you made out like it's probably not true."

Stubble

Odd that they are missing in the September 13th set, eh?

Also odd that everyone said they couldn't find the holes when you are so incredibly sure that these ruin access holes, which are in the wrong places, are the corresponding holes, eh?

Also odd that the Germans lacked the ability to cut rebar apparently and just bent it out of the way, eh?

Hmmm

Because Stubble finds so much about the evidence that is odd, he cannot believe it is true. That is the very definition of the argument from incredulity.