Any interest in a video project?

[Stubble]

I have found video presentation on operation Reinhardt and specifically the Chelmno camp to be woefully lacking.

Is there any interest from the forum in building and uploading a presentation on these camps, or perhaps a series of videos?

Many hands make light work.

[HansHill]

I have found video presentation on operation Reinhardt and specifically the Chelmno camp to be woefully lacking.

Is there any interest from the forum in building and uploading a presentation on these camps, or perhaps a series of videos?

Many hands make light work.

Great idea sir. I can help with drafting or editing script in spare time, I'll also throw in a couple cryptobucks (Monero only) to go towards production / hosting fees

[Stubble]

I'll put together some words and we can refine them and bounce them back and forth.

So far as a budget, this is not a paying gig me thinks. Just a time and effort sink. Maybe codoh will host it for us after completion and they can have any monetization that results.

It is going to get ganked and spread like fire if it is any good, and, for me at least, that's the payment.

I had intended to put it out there free to all via odysee.

[Stubble]

Ideas.

Chapter 1) the t4 connection- discuss the nature of the t4 program, show the 'evidence' for homicidal gas chambers, go over witness testimony etc.

Chapter 2) the Kaiser's Koffee Kafe/gassing gone mobile/dealing with the youth in Asia- discuss the gas vans and their transition from t4 to chelmno.

Chapter 3) operation Reinhard, the destruction of the jew- discuss the different interpretations of operation Reinhardt, the reason for the discrepancy and go over the cartoonish nature of wartime reports and post war testimony.

Chapter 4) the einsatzgruppen, genocidal masters or antiterrorism experts?- cover what the einsatzgruppen was and what it was not, go over their operations, illustrate what they were fighting against and outline their operations and tactics.

Chapter 5) the holocaust of bullets/casting lead- going over the alleged massacres, babi yar, riga etc. Present the claims, then present the evidence. Highlight the incongruency.

Chapter 6) atrocity propaganda, separating the truth from the lies- go over proven fakes like the paris gas chamber, the dachau gas chamber and the majdanek gas chambers, the mass murders in the east fact from fiction, the gas chambers at Auschwitz and the lack of chemical trace, the ridiculous testimony and the proven lies from various witnesses.

There will be more, this is just spitballing.

Thoughts?

[Archie]

For AR we have Denier Bud's One Third of the Holocaust. And Eric Hunt's the Treblinka Archaeology Hoax.

The thing with Chelmno is that most people have never even heard of it, and it is one of the smallest death camps (only around 150,000 deaths claimed which is like a rounding error by Holocaust standards). So it has not gotten all that much attention from either side (vs say Auschwitz), and there is in general a lot less material on it. A lot of our technical arguments have to do with the scale of killing and cremation (which works well for Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Belzec) but for Chelmno (and Sobibor to an extent) this doesn't work as well because the numbers aren't as crazy. There are few Chelmno witnesses, and no famous ones.

I would start by settling on a a scope for the project and selecting a target audience. Is this is a 10 minute video? A 2 hour video? Videos are, imo, especially good for people who are new to the topic. A video doesn't need to be comprehensive. It just needs to convince people that the Holocaust is fishy in some way and make them want to look into it further.

If you look at One Third of the Holocaust, it attacks the core truth claims very directly. He takes footage (especially from Shoah) and repurposes it to undermine the witnesses. He then uses that to undermine the historians because he shows that they rely uncritically on these dubious witnesses. And he attacks the physical plausibility of the story. He uses a similar approach for his Auschwitz video. The Buchenwald video on the other hand doesn't address the Holocaust very directly. It is more about propaganda, but it does erode the credibility of the Americans which ultimately does undermine the Holocaust in domino fashion. He did two other more recent videos (much shorter) that were both in this vein. One advantage of that approach is that it isn't necessarily "Holocaust denial." Depending on the exact content, it might circumvent the Jewish censorship better than a video that says "Auschwitz is a hoax" or something like that. Odysee seems like the best video site right now. I wonder what we could get away with on YouTube. Certainly nothing explicit, but maybe something stealthy.

[Stubble]

Both of those titles are EXCELLENT.

I have found doing leg work on these recent threads with bombs overly burdensome and I want to help out future generations.

I want to put a wide scope on the project, but break it in to easy to consume parts, chapters as it were, ranging in run time from 20:00m to 1:20:00 say.

Another possibility is to create clips from these chapters of say 90 seconds to 5:00 minutes less attentive audiences.

Personally, I find Andkon's Reich's videos on the holocaust palatable, but, with sometimes an over 5 hour run time I can understand how that can be a bit much. He covers so much ground though. He makes some mistakes as well, but if he had a multitude helping him edit, I'm sure his content would be better (he would be more accurate and make less mistakes).

Also, denier Bud's video on gardelegen is excellent, and I feel it merits a mention. Illustrative of a lie to cover an accident and frame the enemy.

[Archie]

I have found doing leg work on these recent threads with bombs overly burdensome and I want to help out future generations.

Don't let him send you on a wild goose chase. That is just one of their tactics. They generally will try to steer things away from the major areas where they know they will get hammered. They want to force the discussion into less familiar territory (or areas where portions of the story at least have some documentary support). In most cases, they aren't actually interesting in discussing any of those things.

[Stubble]

I suppose I could stay in my wheelhouse, if I take the stroll (as I already have in places) it seems like a good thing to pass on the trinkets I find here and there.

[Archie]

I suppose I could stay in my wheelhouse, if I take the stroll (as I already have in places) it seems like a good thing to pass on the trinkets I find here and there.

It's totally up to you. I was just saying that if it feels like he's giving you busy work to try to waste your time, I wouldn't feel obligated to play along.

[Stubble]

I have a chip on my shoulder about the Kaiser's Koffee Kafe, for example, so that at least I'm going to demolish. Utterly.

[Stubble]

Perhaps a video would be redundant and unnecessary.

https://odysee.com/@hocuspocusfocus:5/v ... 08-42-19:f

Here is another one I ran across recently. 10+ hours. Footage taken from all over, but, some original content presented. I haven't watched the whole thing yet, but, I figured I'd share.

[Revision]

Chapter 4) the einsatzgruppen, genocidal masters or antiterrorism experts?- cover what the einsatzgruppen was and what it was not, go over their operations, illustrate what they were fighting against and outline their operations and tactics.

Vincent Reynouard has some relatively good videos on the Einsatzgruppen that are quite unknown by revisionists:

Plea for the Einsatzgruppen - The Holocaust by the bullets:


Einsatzgruppen part 1 - Hitler and the Jewish's war:


Einsatzgruppen part 2 - Why Hitler invaded the USSR:


Einsatzgruppen part 3 – The Einsatzgruppen and the Jews:


Einsatzgruppen part 4 - Lying Judges and Historians Caught Red-Handed: