Online articles and reports on the surveys at Sobibor here;Bane wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2024 12:43 am I was having a debate about the lack of “huge” mass graves amongst the alleged death camps with someone and they said that there have been confirmed mass graves in Sobibor. They didn’t provide any evidence or specifics beyond that so I looked it up myself. I couldn’t really find much except for these:
https://www.auschwitz.org/en/museum/new ... s,228.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sobibor ... ation_camp
For the Wiki link if you click the Aftermath section and scroll down it has some mentions of mass graves at the end of the The Site part (picture of statue below) and right after the Research part. What are your thoughts?
All archaeological work at a grave site needs permissions and not getting permission and disturbing a grave, in any way, is likely illegal in most countries.
The majority of corpses were initially buried. They were then exhumed and cremated when the Nazis became concerned that if discovered, the mass graves would leave too much evidence of their crimes.Did anyone cry out about the excavations conducted at sites like Masada? Or is it just these less than half a dozen sites that create these issues?
If all of the victims were burned and their cremains mixed with sand, why would there be a mass grave?
There are a lot of photos online of what excavations have found at the site. The Nazi cover up ensured there can be no photos of an excavation with hundreds of thousands of bones all lying together in one huge grave.Isn't sobibor where the guy said he saw the SS executing people and he remarked on 'the lady in the red dress'? I seem to recall David Irving mentioning that tidbit in the interview for his biography.
If there were any mass graves at any of these sites, we would have known long ago, and pictures would be plastered in every 4th grade social studies book, history book etc. The fact that there aren't speaks volumes.
That photo is when the main revolt took place and many prisoners escaped.It's like the 1 extant picture of smoke from treblinka. The railroad worker marked it as odd enough that he snapped a picture. The one picture that we have. Odd that he marked smoke from treblinka odd, ain't it?
Although it should be noted that it's claimed only about 80,000 were buried before the cremations started. See the chart which includes Sobibor here:Archie wrote:According to Kola, the area of the graves he claims he found are 3,240 sq meters. For 200,000 or so victims, that would be 62 bodies per sq meter.
Archie wrote: ↑Mon Dec 30, 2024 5:18 pm See Mattogno, Holocaust Handbooks #28 on the AR camps (also #19 on Sobibor). Chapter 5 covers Sobibor archaeology.
https://holocausthandbooks.com/book/the ... or-belzec/
There were some early Communist excavations. Polish archaeologist Kola did core sampling similar to what was done in Belzec. And there have been other more recent follow-ups by Israeli Haimi and others.
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=107
According to Kola, the area of the graves he claims he found are 3,240 sq meters. For 200,000 or so victims, that would be 62 bodies per sq meter. This is not quite as absurd as Belzec or Treblinka since the scale of killing is much lower for Sobibor, but it's still unrealistic. The number buried there was not anywhere close to what they say.
Kola estimated 7 very irregularly shaped graves and in four of them, including the largest, he reports saponified corpses along with cremains.
First there must be evidence that there is a grave or graves at the site.
Did you have a point you were making?
Yes, the Jews devised burial laws 1,500 years ago just so they could delay exhumations for a genocide that they definitely knew they'd be lying about after those 1,500 years had passed.Bane wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 8:31 pm
Yes it’s that “burial law” is a cheap cop out to not provide the utmost convincing evidence you could produce… the mass graves consistent with the death tolls.
I KNEW IT!Numar Patru wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 8:33 pmYes, the Jews devised burial laws 1,500 years ago just so they could delay exhumations for a genocide that they definitely knew they'd be lying about after those 1,500 years had passed.
The only time the actual graves have not been excavated or otherwise dug into, was the 2011 Staffs Uni survey at TII. Every other site survey has dug into the graves and disturbed remains.Bane wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 8:31 pm
Yes it’s that “burial law” is a cheap cop out to not provide the utmost convincing evidence you could produce… the mass graves consistent with the death tolls.