Your point presupposes that one group had control over the other. They didn't.Callafangers wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 7:35 pm Well, you're in a bit of a bind, then, aren't you? If Jews in Germany were against the boycott, why in the hell were Jews internationally not letting them self-determine?
Um, they did. The Centralverein and prominent Jewish business leaders wrote public articles expressing support for the regime and against the boycott.And if these German Jews really were just too fearful to boycott (rather than recognizing Germany was correct in its concerns about Jewish collective behavior), why then would they not protest vehemently this external pressure (international Jewry) putting them at-risk?
Do you not know anything about which you speak?
It's a conversation I won't have because it's perverse and absurd.What matters is whether Hitler was right (largely or in part) about the Jews. But of course, that is a conversation you are not willing to have, which exposes your bias outright.
Jewish over-representation in certain sectors is of course true. What you have not demonstrated and are merely alleging are "corruption" and "resentment," particularly among anyone but a small group of motivated antisemites.Some examples:
- German Jews were disproportionately influential (to a shocking degree) in sectors such as law, media, business, academia, and banking before World War I. They held significant positions in these areas despite being a tiny percentage of the population. The widespread corruption stemming from these sectors led to well-placed resentment among Germans who felt victimized by their own society.
Don't give me generalities. Explain how hyper-inflation in the early 1920s or the economic collapse in 1929 didn't affect German Jews. Otherwise, it's just blather.[*] Jews used their wealth and influence to control economic matters through major banking families like the Rothschilds and Warburgs. These families sucked the life from Germany through domination of finance and business.
Most Jews were not involved in the revolution. Most Jews gravitated toward the center, particularly the Deutsche Demokratische Partei, which had such a high percentage of Jewish members that it was often referred to as "the Jewish party."[*] Jewish activists were instrumental in the November Revolution of 1918, which led to the abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm II and the establishment of the Weimar Republic. Jewish individuals like Rosa Luxemburg and Kurt Eisner led socialist and communist movements, which tried to overthrow existing governments, causing instability and chaos.
Where's your proof that Jews were disproportionately in favor of "criminal and degenerate" behavior? Putting aside for a moment what's bad about Weimar culture, you can't (and haven't) shown that there were not many, many Jews who were opposed to the changes in moral values. You're just assuming.Jews were central to the licentious and morally depraved "Weimar culture," promoting criminal and degenerate behavior and social norms, harming the moral fabric of German society.
So a small number of Jews being involved in revolutions in a minority of European countries is reason to treat badly the Jews in one country? Make it make sense to me, please.[*] Jews instigated social unrest and revolutions, both in Germany and abroad, to further their own interests. This is true, for example, of their efforts in Russia and Hungary as well, demonstrating a pattern of behavior aimed at causing broader European instability.
This is absurd and simply ignores how Germany became involved in WWI. If you're interested in learning why Germany went to war in 1914, I can explain it to you, but you're going to have to put aside the nonsense first.Jews used their wealth and media control to push for WW1, aiming to benefit Zionist goals. They influenced US and German policies, pressured governments, and fueled revolutionary unrest across multiple nations, drawing Germany into the world war to realign global power in their favor. This was utterly devastating the German people, costing millions of lives.
Alleged by you but not proved and, again, no proof that German Jews were shielded from any of these negative effects.[*] Jewish influence contributed to the harsh economic terms imposed on Germany at the end of World War I. This was part of a strategy to weaken Germany and benefit Jewish interests internationally. Countless Germans suffered and starved as a result.
Even if everything you allege was true -- and it's not -- it wouldn't justify expelling all Jews from any country, and that you believe it's warranted say far fucking more about you than about anything else.Expulsion was warranted and necessary to prevent further harm to the German people, who had already suffered greatly as Jews acquired power and got rich from German suffering.
You're positively revolting.Human beings do not have the right to infiltrate, subvert, and turn the will of a nation against itself, costing the lives and livelihood of the people of that nation, in some parasitic and entitled relationship with a pattern of extraordinarily deadly global consequences. You must face the reality that Jews were a toxic, parasitic element in the nations they have occupied. Germany recognized this, and they were overwhelmingly correct and measured in their interpretation. The balance of morality has been firmly against the Jewish position, both in Germany and abroad.
