It is not clear how they were anchored. Kula refers to square timbers and metal bars in the corners. It would be simple to use them to attach the columns to the floor and ceiling. It seems more likely than not they would have been anchored.
Go on give it a try, what is the evidential value of not knowing how the columns were secured, or even if they were secured? I am going to presume you think it is evidence Kula is lying and there were never any such columns inside the Leichenkeller. If so, how does the missing detail from his testimony prove lying?
How does your opinion prove Kula was lying about gassings? Or do you accept it is just your opinion and you cannot prove he lied?Hektor wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2025 5:29 pm The Kula Column Canard turns out to be a rather ridiculous cop out to get around the pesky issues of Zyklon B, which it btw. doesn't..... The handling won't work, the device may cause more problems than it can solve... And then there were plenty of better solutions available....
I think he means angle iron by "iron corner posts". So a 50x50x10 angle (in mm) - which would be a 2x2x3/8 in inches.Among other things the metal workshop made the false showers intended for the gas chambers, as well as the wire-mesh columns for the introduction of the contents of the tins with Zyklon into the gas chambers. These columns were around 3 meters high, and they were 70 centimetres square in plan. Such a column consisted of 6 wire screens which were built the one within the other. The inner screen was made from 3 millimeter thick wire, fastened to iron corner posts of 50 by 10 millimeters. Such iron corner posts were on each corner of the column and connected on the top in the same manner. The openings of the wire mesh were 45 millimeters square. The second screen was made in the same manner, and constructed within the column at 150 millimeters distance from the first. The openings of the second were around 25 millimeters square. In the corners these screens were connected to each other by iron posts. The third part of this column could be moved. It was an empty column with a square footprint of around 150 millimeters made of sheet zinc. At the top it was closed by a metal sheet, and at the bottom with a square base. At a distance of 25 millimetres from the sides of this columns were soldered tin corners supported by tin brackets. On these corners were mounted a thin mesh with openings of about one millimeter square. This mesh ended at the bottom of the column and from here ran in the [Verlaenderung] of the screen a tin frame until the top of the column. The contents of a Zyklon tin were thrown from the top on the distributor, which allowed for a equal distribution of the Zyklon to all four sides of the column. After the evaporation of the gas the whole middle column was taken out. The ventilation system of the gas chamber was installed in the side walls of the gas chambers. The ventilation openings were hidden by zinc covers, provided with round openings.
Someone had brought up this matter on another thread. It looks like cyanide residue was found in the ventilation duct covers. What about the ducts themselves?The wire mesh columns had been totally dismantled after the cessation of gassings and before the demolition of the crematoria, and no remains were found. Yet the dismantling crews had not been able to remove the ventilation system as they were a structural part of the walls, and consequently had overlooked to remove the zinc covers mentioned by Kula. They were dislocated when the demolition squads dynamited the gas chambers, but six of them were retrieved in the rubble of crematorium II and sent for analysis in the forensic laboratory in Cracow. The laboratory report noted that these were covered with a thin, white-coloured and strongly smelling deposit. The laboratory retrieved 7.2 grams of the deposit and dissolved it in water. Sulphuric acid was added to this solution, and the resulting gas was absorbed in an absorbent material. This was divided in two and subjected to two different tests, each of which revealed the presence of hydrocyanide. [310]
[310] Report 15 December 1945 signed of the Forensic Laboratory at Cracow, signed by its Director Dr.Jan Z. Robel, added as Appendix 12 to: Cracow District Commission for the Investigation of German War Crimes, “Protocol on the Machinery of Mass Extermination of Humans in Birkenau,” 26November 1946, transl. Roman Sas-Zalaziocky, in Republic of Austria, Ministry of Justice, Case 20 Vr3806/64 (Ertl/Dejaco), Landesgericht für Strafsachen, Vienna, file ON 264, 393g (r) to 393h (r).
How do you know that the Leichenkeller floor is extant?Stubble wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:35 pm I understand your reasoning Blake, but the problem still exists that the basement floor is extant and there are no penetrations, specifically no penetrations that would correspond to the proposed location of the columns.
So, they had to be anchored in a way that would leave no trace.