were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Gas chambers are like UFOs, someone feeds the hysteria with stories of slaughter and remote locations like Area 51 and the masses believe they are aliens. Ignorant people from Central Europe seeing a delousing chamber and bodies of people who died in transport is the perfect mix to create this narrative. The Germans were able to shock the world with many things, their industrial ethos created this image that if they hated a group then they would kill them on an industrial scale.Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2024 4:13 pm I keep telling you, it's because those rooms didn't use carbon monoxide. They used steam.
They, legitimately did use steam though, for clothing disinfection. That's part of why the steam chamber myth was so pervasive.
Of course, that's just my opinion. Feel free to look in to it yourself. As to where the legitimate, working shower room was, I'm not sure. I'm sure it had one though. Edit: they were in the undressing room. If I were to guess, it would be down at the station, because that is where interviews were conducted, not up the tube.
The Operation Reinhardt camps didn't get any zyklon b when they opened. There were some deliveries late in their operation. They had to delouse clothing somehow. I don't buy that they shipped it to majdanek for delousing. Think of the burden that would have put on that camps facilities given the numbers we are talking about.
In chelmno, gas vans, the real ones for delousing were probably used.not to gas detainees, but to delouse clothing.
http://www.kfzderwehrmacht.de/Hauptseit ... __kw_.html
It's important that inside all the lies about the camps, you are going to find a single grain of truth.
https://odysee.com/@AvaWolfe:d/Vertigo- ... -History:c
Add black propaganda to this, and you end up with a narrative. Then, you get people who say, well, the witnesses! They saw it!...TlsMS93 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2024 9:44 pmGas chambers are like UFOs, someone feeds the hysteria with stories of slaughter and remote locations like Area 51 and the masses believe they are aliens. Ignorant people from Central Europe seeing a delousing chamber and bodies of people who died in transport is the perfect mix to create this narrative. The Germans were able to shock the world with many things, their industrial ethos created this image that if they hated a group then they would kill them on an industrial scale.Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2024 4:13 pm I keep telling you, it's because those rooms didn't use carbon monoxide. They used steam.
They, legitimately did use steam though, for clothing disinfection. That's part of why the steam chamber myth was so pervasive.
Of course, that's just my opinion. Feel free to look in to it yourself. As to where the legitimate, working shower room was, I'm not sure. I'm sure it had one though. Edit: they were in the undressing room. If I were to guess, it would be down at the station, because that is where interviews were conducted, not up the tube.
The Operation Reinhardt camps didn't get any zyklon b when they opened. There were some deliveries late in their operation. They had to delouse clothing somehow. I don't buy that they shipped it to majdanek for delousing. Think of the burden that would have put on that camps facilities given the numbers we are talking about.
In chelmno, gas vans, the real ones for delousing were probably used.not to gas detainees, but to delouse clothing.
http://www.kfzderwehrmacht.de/Hauptseit ... __kw_.html
It's important that inside all the lies about the camps, you are going to find a single grain of truth.
https://odysee.com/@AvaWolfe:d/Vertigo- ... -History:c
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
And the memories of the atrocities of the First World War were still fresh in the collective unconscious, but the Kaiser's Germany did not have the aura of evil that Hitler's regime had to endure, and the media in the Second World War was much more advanced and widespread, and psychological warfare divisions were already established.Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2024 10:03 pmAdd black propaganda to this, and you end up with a narrative. Then, you get people who say, well, the witnesses! They saw it!...TlsMS93 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2024 9:44 pmGas chambers are like UFOs, someone feeds the hysteria with stories of slaughter and remote locations like Area 51 and the masses believe they are aliens. Ignorant people from Central Europe seeing a delousing chamber and bodies of people who died in transport is the perfect mix to create this narrative. The Germans were able to shock the world with many things, their industrial ethos created this image that if they hated a group then they would kill them on an industrial scale.Stubble wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2024 4:13 pm I keep telling you, it's because those rooms didn't use carbon monoxide. They used steam.
They, legitimately did use steam though, for clothing disinfection. That's part of why the steam chamber myth was so pervasive.
Of course, that's just my opinion. Feel free to look in to it yourself. As to where the legitimate, working shower room was, I'm not sure. I'm sure it had one though. Edit: they were in the undressing room. If I were to guess, it would be down at the station, because that is where interviews were conducted, not up the tube.
The Operation Reinhardt camps didn't get any zyklon b when they opened. There were some deliveries late in their operation. They had to delouse clothing somehow. I don't buy that they shipped it to majdanek for delousing. Think of the burden that would have put on that camps facilities given the numbers we are talking about.
In chelmno, gas vans, the real ones for delousing were probably used.not to gas detainees, but to delouse clothing.
http://www.kfzderwehrmacht.de/Hauptseit ... __kw_.html
It's important that inside all the lies about the camps, you are going to find a single grain of truth.
https://odysee.com/@AvaWolfe:d/Vertigo- ... -History:c
Yea, they saw something. They saw trucks, people asked, what is that truck, and somebody said, that's the gas wagon....
Hey, on the other side of the camp, through the tube, what do they do there?
Oh, those are the gas chambers...
Oh my god! They're killing everybody!!!
Indeed a differences. People must bear in mind that the modes of communication drastically changed during the 20th century.TlsMS93 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2024 11:12 pm....
And the memories of the atrocities of the First World War were still fresh in the collective unconscious, but the Kaiser's Germany did not have the aura of evil that Hitler's regime had to endure, and the media in the Second World War was much more advanced and widespread, and psychological warfare divisions were already established.
Anything, rumors to fuel the war effort were welcome, they had to justify hundreds of thousands of deaths in that war.
In the modern era, we have the Bucha massacre, the 40 Israeli babies, the extermination of the Uighurs, all with the same characteristics, but the victor will not be asked if he told the truth.
Yes i understand CO wasn't used to murder hundreds of thousands of people. The purpose of this post, and spreadsheet, is to explain the technical reasons why, to perhaps a new reader. Or as a repository of studies for an experienced debater who perhaps didn't have the material to hand, or know quite how voluminous this body of literature is.
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
His conviction hinged on, warped testimony, extracted confessions, allied propaganda and a presumption of guilt. I don't think an actual instrument of murder had much to do with anything, after all, all allegations surrounding the instrument are just hearsay.HansHill wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 2:24 pm Yes, however the issue that Nessie and co have, is that it's not a Revisionist hoax. Its simply a reading of the claims directly from the horse's mouth.
Nessie and co will likely say, the witnesses are making simple errors and thats ok, but that's not ok. Here for example, is the verbatim verdict of Kurt Franz, who spent almost 30 years imprisoned.
As we can see, his verdict hinged on the executions being performed by diesel engine.
1) This is clearly not a Revisionist hoax, and the crimes, as charged are crystal clear for all to read in the historical record. For them to come along after Revisionists point out the impossibility of these "crimes", and change key details simply to maintain a "guilty" verdict should alarm a normal person only hearing this for the first time.
2) Nessie will tell you, well sometimes eyewitnesses make mistakes. Then he has to explain how entire judicial systems will not only support but amplify, and prosecute these mistakes!
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
Imagine, if you will, a world where the German Authorities spent the equivalent of hundreds of millions of dollars to develop and deploy microwave delousing equipment for Auschwitz to preserve health and to be able to quit buying zyclon b, a relatively dangerous pesticide.HansHill wrote: ↑Fri Dec 20, 2024 2:37 pm Yes i agree with you that the Holocaust Inc / enthusiasts will hand wave it away, but Revisionists can and will continue to accumulate these victories and present them to laymen!
I know this analogy is a bit apples with oranges, but hear me out.
Imagine this wasn't a technicality of diesel vs petrol, and instead imagine this was the viability of Zyklon, or even gas entirely! If revisionists were to chip away at it to such an extent that gas in any format was not viable, then that would be even more alarming to a lay audience, given the mystiqiue of "the gas chambers" in the modern psyche, and cause serious problems for Holocaust Inc.
The bad news is that analogy is a little oversimplified, but the good news is we are not far off that!
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
S. Sivaloganathan,
"Death From Diesel Fumes."
Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine,
Vol. 5 : 3 (1998), pp. 138-139.
ISSN: 1353-1131
( https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-1131(98)90033-5 )
( https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1353113198900335 )
Abstract: A rare fatality from inhalation of diesel motor exhaust fumes is reported and the toxicity of diesel fumes is discussed briefly.