For the mainstream, I would guess the "forest kommando" thing is still the standard story. But details like that are the sort of thing they handwave on. For anti-revisionists (who often come up with their own versions of the stories that are different from the mainstream), I would say they've moved to claiming hypothetical wood deliveries.Basically all testimonies speak about Waldkommandos (forest commandos), squads of detainees appointed to the cut down trees in the nearby forests to obtain wood for the cremation, but for Muehlenkamp this holocaustic truth is intolerable. He appeals to only one witness, whose name Arad distorts and whose statements Muehlenkamp interprets according to his own convenience. Werner Becker in fact declared:
In this regard Schelvis writes:I performed various services, as already stated, I brought victuals for the camp as well as wood for the combustion of people.
The burning of the corpses, at that time already more than one hundred thousand, required a vast quantity of wood, which was abundantly available in the nearby forest. A forest commando was formed which consisted of about 30 working inmates. Under the supervision of several SS members and of Ukrainian security guards it had to cut down trees and saw them into small pieces.
The aerial photos of Treblinka pre-war and post-war prove that no significant logging took place in the immediately vicinity of the camp. The only explanation remaining is the "undocumented wood deliveries" scenario. But that's not history, that's conjecture.Archie wrote: ↑Sat Nov 02, 2024 3:57 pm The traditional story was that the wood was gathered locally by the "forest kommandos."
That is of course not realistic, so more recently Holocaust Controversies has been forced to argue that there must have been enormous undocumented wood deliveries to the camps.
(Graf, Mattogno), T, p. 151)"The environs of Treblinka are today overgrown with fir trees. A 50-yearold fir forest yields 496 tons of wood per hectare. For the sake of simplicity, we round this number to 500 tons. In order to obtain 139,200 tons of wood, the SS would therefore have had to cut down (139,200÷500=) 278.4 hectares of forest, which corresponds to 2.7 square kilometers! But such a large deforested zone would naturally have not gone unnoticed by the local Poles, who were questioned by Judge Łukaszkiewicz in his investigations. On the other hand, in the aerial photographs of May and November 1944 a thick forest of approximately 100 hectares can be recognized on the north and east side of the camp, of which at least one hectare is located on the camp area itself."
The roots of evil - John Kekes
Quoting, " A common hardwood, red oak, has an energy content (heat value) of 14.9 megajoules per kilogram". A box as described is about 100 grams, so about 1.49 MJ is about two slices of bread (potential energy). If the energy of two slices of bread can cremate a body it is a shame the Indians who have been cremating bodies for millenia have not figured this out to conserve wood.
Here you are, sir:Waldgänger wrote: ↑Thu Nov 07, 2024 11:28 amArchie, can you please give a specific reference for this work? Is this a PDF or print book? It's not among the Handbooks I can find. Thank you.
Thank you so much. No wonder it was a little difficult to find. Both this (especially the chapter trying to trace a Führerbefehl for extermination) and the current Vol. 28 are very helpful.Archie wrote: ↑Thu Nov 07, 2024 3:13 pmHere you are, sir:Waldgänger wrote: ↑Thu Nov 07, 2024 11:28 amArchie, can you please give a specific reference for this work? Is this a PDF or print book? It's not among the Handbooks I can find. Thank you.
https://archive.org/details/carlo-matto ... 9/mode/2up
This book was part of Holocaust Handbooks (volume 28) but it was removed and replaced with Mattogno's newer book on the AR camps. It's basically a really long, point-by-point rebuttal of the HC "white paper." Rudolf seems to have felt that it was too long and impossible to read, hence why it was replaced. But it is a quite useful source of arguments. I would recommend using it as a reference or reading a chapter here and there rather than trying to read the whole thing straight through (although you can try if you want).
I think it was available in two volumes in physical form at one point but they don't seem to sell that anymore.