What is the revisionist account of where the jews went?

[Callafangers]

Your inability to identify 1/10,000th of the victims of the Holocaust as having survived is noted.

Are you the best this place has to offer?

Provide a picture of a single Jew being gassed or else the Holocaust didn't happen. Oh can't do it? Your inability to provide a picture of a Jew being gassed is noted. Get rekt.

You seem like an awesome person with lots of friends

It's actually true, though. fireofice is clearly based AF which makes for good friendship.

Meanwhile, you're here as a student of Dr. Terry, bitter that your Superman just ain't "got it" anymore. I feel for you, people just aren't buying his word-count-spamming and evasion of things like evidence hierarchies and power structure variables. Virtually all of the exterminationist talking points with any 'bite' to them have been completely flattened in recent years. The debate is all but over, at least in terms of what might be considered "Phase 1"; that is, getting revisionism a fair hearing in the general public.

It's still an uphill battle but things are definitely getting interesting.

[Archie]

Your inability to identify 1/10,000th of the victims of the Holocaust as having survived is noted.

Are you the best this place has to offer?

Provide a picture of a single Jew being gassed or else the Holocaust didn't happen. Oh can't do it? Your inability to provide a picture of a Jew being gassed is noted. Get rekt.

The whole reason they ask for INDIVIDUAL names is because they are banking on the fact that such a question requires access to often restricted sources that the normally circumstanced person is unlikely to have access to (or time to review). It's a pathetic misdirection play intended to distract from their total inability to prove their claims.

Consider that you could read all 42 volumes of the IMT, all of the NMT microfilms. You could read Hilberg cover-to-cover and hundreds of other books. And none of that would help you much with compiling that sort of personal data.

If that info still exists, it's in the hands of the Israelis or in Eastern Europe. They want us to piece together our own version of the Yad Vashem database, lol.

[Archie]

Jews are the only group to have been "exterminated" and to have become more powerful afterwards.

In other countries, it's taken for granted that Jews dominate America.

Google “Rwandan Patriotic Front”

Oh, yeah. Rwanda is really a global powerhouse.

Let's compare to Jews. Jews founded a completely new country which now has like 7M people. And they are dominant in America which is the world superpower.

[Hektor]

Given your unwillingness to find even 1/10,000th of a percent of the survivors, I can see why you lean into those areas where you think you have a strong case.

You don’t. Terry showed that.

Now that's a twisted logic you are following here. So if I can't identify present somebody as survivor, he must have been murdered in some way. In fact My inability to name a survivor is prove for an extrapolated figure to have been killed.

You are shifting the burden of proof. Nobody suggests that the other millions of people from that era have all been murdered, just because for the vast majority no whereabouts can be shown... Now the extermination cop out is then, that nobody suggests they all have been murdered... Now that's funny, so you admit, you believe the Holocaust Tale, because it's suggested over and over again. Unbelievable, to say the least.

[Numar Patru]

Given your unwillingness to find even 1/10,000th of a percent of the survivors, I can see why you lean into those areas where you think you have a strong case.

Now that's a twisted logic you are following here. So if I can't identify present somebody as survivor, he must have been murdered in some way.

Not quite. If you can't identify someone who was demonstrably deported to Belzec as having survived after being sent to the camp, then he was murdered at Belzec.

In fact My inability to name a survivor is prove for an extrapolated figure to have been killed.

A total of roughly 600,000 Jews were sent to Belzec. I'm asking for the names of six survivors.

You are shifting the burden of proof.

Not really. We know the number of Jews sent to Belzec, we have tons of testimony that the Jews sent to Belzec were killed there, and we even have bodies in the ground there. What we don't have is literally any other plausible explanation for what happened to these half million Jews.

Nobody suggests that the other millions of people from that era have all been murdered, just because for the vast majority no whereabouts can be shown... Now the extermination cop out is then, that nobody suggests they all have been murdered... Now that's funny, so you admit, you believe the Holocaust Tale, because it's suggested over and over again. Unbelievable, to say the least.

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here.

[TlsMS93]

It's the same as asking where the people who entered the stadium went after the event.

The one who has to prove the murder is the one who accuses and leaves no doubt, not in convictions based on circumstances.

[Numar Patru]

Great analogy. Imagine half a million people went to a stadium for a football. Match. Now imagine nobody was ever seen again. Imagine the very subways that brought then to the stadium being empty after the game ended. Imagine local closed-circuit televisions showing no one waiting for trains home. Now, imagine the owners of the stadium blowing it up afterward.

That’s the analogy. Don’t be dim.

[TlsMS93]

A total of roughly 600,000 Jews were sent to Belzec. I'm asking for the names of six survivors.

Not really. We know the number of Jews sent to Belzec, we have tons of testimony that the Jews sent to Belzec were killed there

It's unbelievable.

[Numar Patru]

Is that seriously your response? Are you really this pathetic?

[TlsMS93]

6 survivors, actually three according to orthodoxy, really is a ton of witnesses.

[Numar Patru]

I’m talking about the perpetrators and other German witnesses, not just the survivors.

[Hektor]

Given your unwillingness to find even 1/10,000th of a percent of the survivors, I can see why you lean into those areas where you think you have a strong case.

Now that's a twisted logic you are following here. So if I can't identify present somebody as survivor, he must have been murdered in some way.

Not quite. If you can't identify someone who was demonstrably deported to Belzec as having survived after being sent to the camp, then he was murdered at Belzec.
....

That's exterminationist insanity in a nut-shell.
According to that pseudologic, if it can't be demonstrate that someone that moved from Montana to California, than he must have been murdered in California.

[Numar Patru]

Now that's a twisted logic you are following here. So if I can't identify present somebody as survivor, he must have been murdered in some way.

Not quite. If you can't identify someone who was demonstrably deported to Belzec as having survived after being sent to the camp, then he was murdered at Belzec.
....

That's exterminationist insanity in a nut-shell.
According to that pseudologic, if it can't be demonstrate that someone that moved from Montana to California, than he must have been murdered in California.

Almost there.

If it can’t be demonstrated that he moved to California, then he probably didn’t move to California.

If his murderer tells you he murdered him in Montana and his body is in the ground in Montana, then you can safely conclude he was murdered there.

[Hektor]

Not quite. If you can't identify someone who was demonstrably deported to Belzec as having survived after being sent to the camp, then he was murdered at Belzec.
....

That's exterminationist insanity in a nut-shell.
According to that pseudologic, if it can't be demonstrate that someone that moved from Montana to California, than he must have been murdered in California.

Almost there.

If it can’t be demonstrated that he moved to California, then he probably didn’t move to California.

If his murderer tells you he murdered him in Montana and his body is in the ground in Montana, then you can safely conclude he was murdered there.

If I have to explain to you what an analogy is, I'm not sure, whether the subject can even be explained to you.

[Stubble]

I'm gonna bump this one. Not because I found 6 jews from balzac, but because I've got 1 random jew reunited with his not so dead brother.

https://ihr.org/journal/v13n1p45_weber-html

There's also the pre and post war jewish census from the jewish encyclopedia that doesn't reflect millions of missing jews.

Honestly though, until I see a reasonable explanation for the disposition of 11,000,000 dead bodies, I'm not going to take anybody's word for it.

See, there suppose to be 5,000,000 dead goyim too. You add another 5,000,000 to the 6,000,000 and you've changed the calculus for disposal quite a bit.

Another question I've got is, where were the other 5,000,000 victims gassed? We know that 4,000,000 jews were gassed at Auschwitz, and 2,000,000 jews were gassed at majdanek, so, maybe 5,000,000 non jews were gassed at treblinka?