Liar.
The existence of even one mass grave at Belzec has never been proven.
NOT. ONE.
EVER.
Liar.
SOP is 4-6" of sand Bombsaway. 'Around' 10 centimeters.bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:10 pmah I misread you there, thought you meant feet, my mistake. 10 centimeters of sand isn't a lot.Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:01 pm Gerstein misses the quick lime, but, he does get the 4" of sand right. That's, SOP. Here you were claiming that that didn't exist, and now you dumbly quote it to Keen.
Which is it Bombsaway?
Don't get me wrong, Gerstein's testimony is garbage and his grave estimate in no way reflects reality, but, he did know the SOP, sort of.
Sure bombsaway, I'll be incredibly detailed.
There is Nessie:
What are you waiting for Nessie?A - $100.00 reward - is being offered for each one of the 33 alleged graves / cremation pits in question that is proven - with the same standard of proof applied in U. S. civil courts - to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of - at least 2 people.
https://thisisaboutscience.com/
Maybe you use that grave cap (as I understand it the amount of soil you put on top the grave) if you don't have space constraints. If you do the 10 centimeters described by Gerstein could suffice.Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:19 pmSOP is 4-6" of sand Bombsaway. 'Around' 10 centimeters.bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:10 pmah I misread you there, thought you meant feet, my mistake. 10 centimeters of sand isn't a lot.Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:01 pm Gerstein misses the quick lime, but, he does get the 4" of sand right. That's, SOP. Here you were claiming that that didn't exist, and now you dumbly quote it to Keen.
Which is it Bombsaway?
Don't get me wrong, Gerstein's testimony is garbage and his grave estimate in no way reflects reality, but, he did know the SOP, sort of.
Why you would think it was feet, I don't know. A 1 meter 'grave cap' was SOP for Ze Germans IIRC. I'd have to go back and look. The manuals are in the National Archives.
Basically, you can look at the surface area in square meters and subtract that many cubic meters as 'grave cap' as the 'grave cap' is supposed to be 'on grade' or 'level' with the ground.
I'm currently still winnowing 't' series documents however, looking for your missing jews.
Sorry, 1.5m grave cap, my bad. 1.5m.
Look at bombsaway run from the simple questions:bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 10:14 pmMaybe you use that grave cap (as I understand it the amount of soil you put on top the grave) if you don't have space constraints. If you do the 10 centimeters described by Gerstein could suffice.Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:19 pmSOP is 4-6" of sand Bombsaway. 'Around' 10 centimeters.
Why you would think it was feet, I don't know. A 1 meter 'grave cap' was SOP for Ze Germans IIRC. I'd have to go back and look. The manuals are in the National Archives.
Basically, you can look at the surface area in square meters and subtract that many cubic meters as 'grave cap' as the 'grave cap' is supposed to be 'on grade' or 'level' with the ground.
I'm currently still winnowing 't' series documents however, looking for your missing jews.
Sorry, 1.5m grave cap, my bad. 1.5m.
#1 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The USHMM alleges that 600,000 jews were killed in Belzec - ??
#2 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; It is alleged in orthodox histriography that the remains of the jews who were killed in Belzec currently lie in 33 mass graves within the boundary of the camp - ??
#3 - Is it - True. - or - False. - that; The largest (in terms of quantity of remains) of the 33 alleged mass graves in question, contains the remains of less than 5 people - ??
#4 - If your answer to question #3 was - False. - then; list all of the graves that have been “scientifically proven” to currently exist at Belzec, in which verified human remains have been uncovered / tangibly located via bona fide, verifiably honest and conclusively documented archaeology - that contains the remains of more than 5 people.
10cm between layers, 1.5m grave cap.bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 10:14 pmMaybe you use that grave cap (as I understand it the amount of soil you put on top the grave) if you don't have space constraints. If you do the 10 centimeters described by Gerstein could suffice.Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:19 pmSOP is 4-6" of sand Bombsaway. 'Around' 10 centimeters.
Why you would think it was feet, I don't know. A 1 meter 'grave cap' was SOP for Ze Germans IIRC. I'd have to go back and look. The manuals are in the National Archives.
Basically, you can look at the surface area in square meters and subtract that many cubic meters as 'grave cap' as the 'grave cap' is supposed to be 'on grade' or 'level' with the ground.
I'm currently still winnowing 't' series documents however, looking for your missing jews.
Sorry, 1.5m grave cap, my bad. 1.5m.
That's what Gerstein said, that was the grave cap. "Then ten centimeters of sand were spread over the pit, so that only a few heads and arms still rose from it here and there."Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 11:13 pm10cm between layers, 1.5m grave cap.bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 10:14 pmMaybe you use that grave cap (as I understand it the amount of soil you put on top the grave) if you don't have space constraints. If you do the 10 centimeters described by Gerstein could suffice.Stubble wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 9:19 pm
SOP is 4-6" of sand Bombsaway. 'Around' 10 centimeters.
Why you would think it was feet, I don't know. A 1 meter 'grave cap' was SOP for Ze Germans IIRC. I'd have to go back and look. The manuals are in the National Archives.
Basically, you can look at the surface area in square meters and subtract that many cubic meters as 'grave cap' as the 'grave cap' is supposed to be 'on grade' or 'level' with the ground.
I'm currently still winnowing 't' series documents however, looking for your missing jews.
Sorry, 1.5m grave cap, my bad. 1.5m.
Are you seriously saying somebody would put 10cm of dirt on top of a mass grave?
No offense, I did have to check. You aren't lying, he did say that. Still ain't SOP though.bombsaway wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 11:24 pmThat's what Gerstein said, that was the grave cap. "Then ten centimeters of sand were spread over the pit, so that only a few heads and arms still rose from it here and there."
Just from a health and hygiene standpoint, that's ridiculous. That would have been foul, pestilent, and would have caused the staff to become ill. That's, unsafe, unsanitary and repulsive.The naked corpses were carried on wooden stretchers to pits only a few meters away, measuring 100 x 20 x 12 meters. After a few days the corpses welled up and a short time later they collapsed, so that one could throw a new layer of bodies upon them. Then ten centimeters of sand were spread over the pit, so that a few heads and arms still rose from it here and there. At such a place I saw Jews climbing over the corpses and working. One told me that by mistake those who arrived dead had not been stripped. Of course this has to be done later because of the Spinnstoffsammlung and valuables which otherwise they would take with them into the grave.
Well we have the report from OK Ostrow, which was 20 km awayStubble wrote: ↑Tue Sep 09, 2025 12:10 amNo offense, I did have to check. You aren't lying, he did say that. Still ain't SOP though.
https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/th ... ein-report
Just from a health and hygiene standpoint, that's ridiculous. That would have been foul, pestilent, and would have caused the staff to become ill. That's, unsafe, unsanitary and repulsive.The naked corpses were carried on wooden stretchers to pits only a few meters away, measuring 100 x 20 x 12 meters. After a few days the corpses welled up and a short time later they collapsed, so that one could throw a new layer of bodies upon them. Then ten centimeters of sand were spread over the pit, so that a few heads and arms still rose from it here and there. At such a place I saw Jews climbing over the corpses and working. One told me that by mistake those who arrived dead had not been stripped. Of course this has to be done later because of the Spinnstoffsammlung and valuables which otherwise they would take with them into the grave.
Of course, there's about another 10 miles of ridiculousness from Gerstein.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_ ... ead_bodies
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-16353-xTo those in close contact with the dead, such as rescue workers, there is a health risk from chronic infectious diseases which those killed may have been suffering from and which spread by direct contact, including hepatitis B and hepatitis C, HIV, enteric intestinal pathogens, tuberculosis, cholera and others
/shrugBlowflies and houseflies are the first organisms to arrive on carcasses, decaying organic matter and faeces on which they feed, breed, and lay eggs. It is likely that they acquire a significant part of their microbiome from such environments, which they transport and subsequently deposit onto other hosts, such as humans, animals, and plants.
It has never been proven that the fraudulently alleged "ash layers" in the fraudulently alleged "huge mass gravses" actually exist.
You have to show that there's a risk of aerial transmission from a hundreds of feet away, where the guards would be. Is it just the flies. Miasma is not realStubble wrote: ↑Tue Sep 09, 2025 12:44 amhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_ ... ead_bodies
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-16353-xTo those in close contact with the dead, such as rescue workers, there is a health risk from chronic infectious diseases which those killed may have been suffering from and which spread by direct contact, including hepatitis B and hepatitis C, HIV, enteric intestinal pathogens, tuberculosis, cholera and others
/shrugBlowflies and houseflies are the first organisms to arrive on carcasses, decaying organic matter and faeces on which they feed, breed, and lay eggs. It is likely that they acquire a significant part of their microbiome from such environments, which they transport and subsequently deposit onto other hosts, such as humans, animals, and plants.
A giant pile of rotten corpses is, not sanitary, and is in reality, a rotten cesspool. I'm, surprised you are unaware of this fact.
Nessie,
Aether theory is also bunk. Flies are a vector, and easy to cite, but they are not alone. There are a whole host of other issues. Runoff for example becomes a concern. Of course, ground water contamination. Contact from flies and other vermin exposed.bombsaway wrote: ↑Tue Sep 09, 2025 12:56 amYou have to show that there's a risk of aerial transmission from a hundreds of feet away, where the guards would be. Is it just the flies. Miasma is not realStubble wrote: ↑Tue Sep 09, 2025 12:44 amhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_ ... ead_bodies
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-16353-xTo those in close contact with the dead, such as rescue workers, there is a health risk from chronic infectious diseases which those killed may have been suffering from and which spread by direct contact, including hepatitis B and hepatitis C, HIV, enteric intestinal pathogens, tuberculosis, cholera and others
/shrugBlowflies and houseflies are the first organisms to arrive on carcasses, decaying organic matter and faeces on which they feed, breed, and lay eggs. It is likely that they acquire a significant part of their microbiome from such environments, which they transport and subsequently deposit onto other hosts, such as humans, animals, and plants.
A giant pile of rotten corpses is, not sanitary, and is in reality, a rotten cesspool. I'm, surprised you are unaware of this fact.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miasma_theory