Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

For more adversarial interactions
User avatar
Wahrheitssucher
Posts: 242
Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 2:51 pm

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by Wahrheitssucher »

bombsaway wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 2:00 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:52 pm Are the "graves" proven to not exist?
Are "unicorns" proven to not exist?”

Both use the same logic. Do you agree?
No lol, I think there is credible evidence…
Erm… Ok. :?
You have confirmed that the problem is that you DO have an unfortunate comprehension disability.

LAST ATTEMPT TO ASSIST YOU:
You weren’t asked if there was ‘evidence’ for either.
You were asked to compare the logic being used in two sentences, arguing for existence of both unicorns and the alleged mass-graves.
b
bombsaway
Posts: 1071
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2024 2:23 am

Re: Aktion 1005 Was Not To Destroy Remains?

Post by bombsaway »

Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 3:16 pm
bombsaway wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 2:00 pm
Wahrheitssucher wrote: Tue Jul 15, 2025 1:52 pm Are the "graves" proven to not exist?
Are "unicorns" proven to not exist?”

Both use the same logic. Do you agree?
No lol, I think there is credible evidence…
Erm… Ok. :?
You have confirmed that the problem is that you DO have an unfortunate comprehension disability.

LAST ATTEMPT TO ASSIST YOU:
You weren’t asked if there was ‘evidence’ for either.
You were asked to compare the logic being used in two sentences, arguing for existence of both unicorns and the alleged mass-graves.
I don't use the "proven to not exist" as an argument for why mass graves exist. What i was trying to convey was that keens questionnaire was pointless.
Post Reply