Stubble, from this thread;
https://codohforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=12504#p12504
The CSC study, in my opinion, shows much the same of what Krege claimed, insufficient grave space. (ie largely undisturbed ground)
The only pits located in the area proposed are g-50, g51, g52, g53 and g54. For the alleged >850,000 victims, they amount to a thimble, the dead wouldn't fit as a liquid.
Nessie claims more mass graves under the concrete and you claim more in the trees and under rocks, and anywhere else that either hasn't been checked or had a vegetation change. It is worth noting, 3 teams of witnesses made 3 separate maps from '45-'46, all 3 indicated 4 pits in roughly the location of the gpr returns labeled g51, g52, g53 and g54. In my opinion, that would be the extent of the grave space, if it were ever confirmed to actually hold human remains. Basically, if I were looking for mass graves at Treblinka II, I'd start my search where the witnesses indicated and where the GPR had returns.
This is wrong. There were two areas eyewitnesses stated contained mass graves, the south-eastern part, which is where G50-54 are located, along with G36. They surround the main memorial. Pits G4 and G38 are at the south of the camp. Pits G1, G44 and G32 are in the second area identified by eyewitnesses, in the south-western part, the Lazarete. Most of that area is covered by the smaller memorial.
Stubble states it is me claiming there are more mass graves under the memorial. He is dodging that it is the evidence from the eyewitnesses and the photos of the site before it was memorialised, that proves the majority of the graves are under the memorials. That was the whole point of the memorials, to protect the graves from robbers.
However, in 1966, when the memorial was constructed, the Poles did not have GPR, so they missed some grave space. The memorial should have been even larger. Thankfully, the grave robbing has stopped, so those missed graves have been undisturbed.
Stubble is cherry-picking as little of the evidence as possible, to try and minimise the volume of disturbed ground he accepts as grave space. That is a common tactic amongst so-called revisionist, that only they fall for.
(See figure 4.29, on page 208 of the C S-C report, to see the layout of the pits, superimposed on the 1944 aerial photo and since the memorial was built.)