
Correspond with the yellow areas that are the G50-54 pits found in the 2011 survey here;

Bear in mind the orientations are different.
My gosh Nessie! You are right!
were to guess why no t4 personnel were chosen to perform gassing that had experience with gassing, it would be because THERE WERE NONE.
I believe in the Roman positive, black and white and not in circumstances, not in anecdotal testimonies, not in code words, in my legal system and in the culture in which I am inserted this does not satisfy, if it satisfies you that is your problem, I do not make extrapolations, Jews with their stories and traditions do this from their literature, the problem is wanting the rest of the world to swallow this, I will not contest whether biblical events were historical or not with Jews, now in a classroom it is different, with the Holocaust it is the same thing.Nessie wrote: ↑Tue Jul 08, 2025 4:18 pm
So-called revisionists have rejected a Polish and British surveys and they will reject any and all, no matter the source, when they merely confirm what has already been found. This is why it is more accurate to call people deniers, as all they do is deny the evidence of mass graves. They produce zero evidence to prove there were no mass graves.
It is a slight diversion but ultimately these are complementary topics.joshk246 wrote: ↑Sun Jul 06, 2025 4:36 pmbombsaway wrote: ↑Sun Jul 06, 2025 4:23 pmthis question is a diversion from the archeological evidence, the point of the thread
the archeological evidence, based on the immediate post war survey, indicates mass burial and body destruction
most of the camp is now forested, so the GPR scans of the non-forested parts do not allow us to set a limit on maximum amount of grave space in the campThe mass graves rely on the cremation fairytale being true.this question is a diversion from the archeological evidence, the point of the thread
No cremations = No mass graves.
I’ll concede it’s a slight diversion off topic, this thread has become very repetitive.