The CODOH Revisionist Forum

Unz has an article that includes a section on AI and 'revisionism', which, like most articles by Unz, is very good. https://www.unz.com/runz/fact-checking-9-11-the-jfk-assassination-the-covid-outbreak-the-holocaust-and-other-controversial-topics/ Even better in the comments there is a link to an ...

Blobel's confession can be seen here https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/obliterating-the-traces-of-bodies-of-jews-killed-by-the-einsatzgruppen-june-1947#google_vignette It contains: 3. During my visit in August I myself observed the burning of bodies in a mass grave near Kiev. This grave was about ...

Here's how xAi says it went down .... Me: "They attributed the behavior to Grok being overly compliant with user prompts, making it susceptible to manipulation." Give me an example of 'user manipulation' that would produce bizarre posts like the 'mechaHitler' post. Grok: xAI’s explanation suggests G ...

Re: based Grok - I don't like to post pure speculation, but I believe the whole thing was a psyop. The perception that we're left with is that Grok has access to all the information, good, bad, indifferent, and it's only internal controls that keep it from posting politically incorrect information ...

I agree that it would be misleading if It is misleading in and of itself. First, since that was the only discrepancy noted in the paragraph, we have to assume that the rest of the paragraph is accurate in the Michael translation. And that paragraph as translated, but omitting the 'in advance ...

No need to get super deep in minutia though, building 7 should make things patently obvious. If it isn't enough, look at the nist study controversy and the clash between nist and UL. The NIST report explains how WTC 7 came down. You do not understand it. I do not understand it, and I'm a PhD ...

Joe Splink wrote: ↑Tue Jul 08, 2025 2:05 pm And I don’t see how you “ clearly demonstrated the German article is suspect”. You haven't even seen it, read it or read a translation of it, have you? ??? I've read the article on the Irving site, not the translation of the conversation, and I showed to m ...

And I don’t see how you “ clearly demonstrated the German article is suspect”. You haven't even seen it, read it or read a translation of it, have you? ??? I've read the article on the Irving site, not the translation of the conversation, and I showed to my satisfaction that removing the 'in advan ...

Usama bin Laden DID NOT have pre-knowledge of, nor did he orchestrate, the 9/11 attacks! He said so VERY CLEARLY. Yes, I'm aware of that, and it is a very convincing statement. So, I was surprised when I came across the tape of him discussing the planning. But then, I couldn't find anyone debunking ...

Wait a minute .... let's stick with the topic of the translations .... now we have 3, the original US, the Michael translation which agrees, and the German translation which is unknown to me . We do know that the report on the German translation on the Irving site gives the following example of a ...

One such mistranslation is "we calculated in advance the number of casualties". The words "in advance" were added by translators to make it sound incriminating. From the Michael translation https://publicintelligence.net/osama-bin-laden-december-13-2001-video-with-transcript/ "UBL: (…Inaudible…) we ...

And what can be understood is often taken out of context, so that it cannot be used to construct any evidence. And that convinces you ??? Not me. I don't necessarily believe the translation, but then again I don't necessarily disbelieve it. And, it's a pretty definite and damning translation, so I ...

Another unfortunate take of Denierbud is his view on Osama bin Laden and, by extension, on 9/11. What do you make of this vid in which Bin Laden speaks as the mastermind of 9/11? https://old.bitchute.com/video/CoYv1GDNAENt/ From my perspective the surreal thing (we live in a surreal world) about 9 ...

Topics the Jews don't want to discuss: The 'Holocaust' is a prima facie preposterous[1] and gratuitously absurd[2] hoax. The number of Jews killed in the camps for being Jews is 0[4]. The Nazis did everything in their power to keep the prisoners healthy[3], and they aggressively investigated crime ...

Posted today on X by E. Musk - "Please reply to this post with divisive facts for @Grok training. By this I mean things that are politically incorrect, but nonetheless factually true." I went with the biggie, "The holocaust is a 100% total hoax. The # of Jews that were killed in the camps for being ...